Janet Yellen: Where she stands on five key economic policy issues

If confirmed as Fed chairman, Janet Yellen would influence the trajectory of the economy going forward. Here's where she stands on five key policy issues facing the world's most powerful central bank. 

3. Inflation

Robert Galbraith/Reuters/File
Yellen prepares to address the University of California Berkeley Haas School of Business in Berkeley last year.

Because employment is her top priority, Yellen has a reputation for being an "inflation dove" – unconcerned with rising inflation. But the Fed has a dual mandate: not only maximum employment but also stable prices, which means low inflation. These goals are contradictory because lowering interest rates to boost jobs heightens the risk of inflation, and raising interest rates to fight inflation heightens the risk of unemployment. And Yellen's various stances on inflation reflects that inherent tension.

As a Fed governor in 1996, citing what she thought was an unnaturally low unemployment rate, she warned strongly against rising inflation during a Fed meeting: "Clearly, we have an economy operating at a level where we need to be nervous about rising inflation, even abstracting from supply side shocks," she said. "We can't dismiss the possibility that compensation growth will drift upward, raising core inflation and in turn inflationary expectations. This is a major risk. Obviously, we need to be vigilant in scrutinizing the data for signs of rising wages and salaries."

But she's also argued to allow some inflation, and has been instrumental in keeping it rising at about 2 percent annually during her time with the Fed. According to experts, she has little interest in prices rising beyond that. “The market does have it wrong if they think she is going to be soft on inflation,” Stephen Oliner, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington and former senior adviser at the Federal Reserve Board, told Bloomberg. “She has very little tolerance for inflation above the 2 percent target."

3 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.