Chipotle sued for allegedly stealing ramen concept

Chipotle faces a lawsuit accusing it of misleading a world-class chef and ripping off another chef’s ideas for a chain of ramen shops in the US. Chipotle declined comment. 

|
Business Wire/File
In an ad campaign in 2011, Chipotle wrapped its signature burritos in gold foil to call attention to the ingredients it uses. The Mexican fast food chain is being sued by a top chef over allegations it roped him into unwittingly stealing another chef's ideas.

Chipotle Mexican Grill has found itself embroiled in a legal food fight – one that alleges the Mexican food chain misled a world-class chef and ripped off another chef’s ideas to launch a chain of ramen shops in the US.

Kyle Connaughton, a British chef who carved out his name in the culinary world through his work with elite restaurants around the globe, is suing Chipotle and its founder, Steve Ells, for allegedly ensnaring him in the mess.

In his lawsuit, Connaughton says that, in 2010, he came up with the idea to create a chain of fast food restaurants serving “high-quality ramen cuisine.” He presented the concept to a number of restaurateurs – and when Ells offered to ink an exclusive deal to make the concept a reality, he teamed up with Chipotle.

That’s when things began sliding downhill.

What Connaughton says he did not know at the time was that, three years prior, Chipotle had allegedly tried to create essentially the same ramen chain with another chef, David Chang. When Chang – founder of Momofuku restaurants – backed out, Chipotle allegedly ran off with Chang’s ideas; and Chang, who had not given Chipotle permission to use his ideas, reportedly planned to sue Chipotle once it rolled out Connaughton’s ramen shops.

Ells’ failure to disclose his prior work with Chang was “a material omission” and a “fraudulent” act, Connaughton charges.

“If Mr. Connaughton forged ahead and implemented his ramen concept at Chipotle despite the prior business dealings with Momofuku, his professional reputation would be ruined,” the lawsuit says. “He could never escape the accusation that he had stolen Momofuku’s ramen concepts.”

Those “ramen concepts” included plans for menu items, kitchen designs, the interior of the restaurant, and packaging for the ramen – things Connaughton says he discussed with Chipotle. Now, he says he's not sure whether the feedback he had received from Chipotle came from Chipotle or had been regurgitated from Chang’s ideas.

When Connaughton confronted Ells in October 2012, the lawsuit alleges, Ells did not deny anything, but “ordered” Connaughton to move ahead anyway with the ramen concept – something Connaughton said was akin to him being “perfectly willing to drag [him] into a lawsuit.”

About a month later, Connaughton was fired, the lawsuit contends, because he confronted Ells about his business with Chang.

Chipotle declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying in an e-mail that, “as a matter of policy, we don’t comment on pending legal action.”

Connaughton’s lawsuit, which has asked for an undetermined amount of compensation, was filed on May 31, 2013. Ells has up to 30 days to respond to the complaints.

With Connaughton’s dismissal from Chipotle and a lawsuit against the company pending, it looks like – to the disappointment of noodle fans – Chipotle-spearheaded ramen shops will not be cropping up in the US anytime soon.

Before the brouhaha erupted, Chipotle had been eyeing a site on 12th Street and University Place in Manhattan for the flagship ramen store, according to the lawsuit.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Chipotle sued for allegedly stealing ramen concept
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2013/0607/Chipotle-sued-for-allegedly-stealing-ramen-concept
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe