Where the next Silicon Valleys might be

One way to identify tomorrow's hubs of innovation is to look at cities whose residents are granted the most patents, which includes smaller places such as Burlington, Vt., and Corvallis, Ore.

Rich Clabaugh/Staff
A listing of some of the most inventive metro areas across the US. Source material courtesy of the Brookings Institution.

The 1970s were not kind to Seattle. The Economist magazine had dubbed it "the city of despair." Its big employer, Boeing, had endured multiple setbacks and had shed jobs. To counteract the gloom, two real estate agents tried a little humor with the billboard message "Will the last person leaving Seattle turn out the lights."

Then in 1979, the founders of Microsoft moved their small software company from Albuquerque, N.M., to Seattle, their hometown. At the time, the cities had roughly similar labor markets. Seattle had just five more college graduates per 100 residents than Albuquerque did.

But with the subsequent boom of Microsoft, Seattle has transformed itself into one of America's premier Knowledge Economy cities. It now has 45 more college graduates per 100 residents than Albuquerque has. Those graduates, who in 1980 outearned Albuquerque's by $4,200 a year, now outearn them by $14,000.

The city's cultural and social scenes are vibrant. Seattle's crime rate, which was higher than Albuquerque's in 1979, is now lower.

"We keep thinking of the US as one labor market," says Enrico Moretti, an economist at the University of California at Berkeley and author of the book "The New Geography of Jobs." "The reality is that there are 300 labor markets" – one for each metropolitan area.

The innovative ones grow and prosper. They not only create good jobs for college-educated workers, they also enhance the pay of lower-skilled workers. "Different skills tend to complement each other...," says Mr. Moretti. "They need each other."

But in less innovative urban areas, education levels, productivity, and pay stagnate. The gap between the highly innovative and less innovative metros is something Moretti calls the "great divergence." Workers in the top-tier cities earn two to three times what their counterparts do in the bottom tier. And the gap is growing.

So which city will be the next Seattle, transforming itself into an innovation hub?

While no one knows for sure, one hint may come from patents. Cities whose residents have been granted the most patents up to now – including San Jose, Calif.; San Francisco; and New York – are already generating lots of high-paying jobs. But a smaller city with a high number of patents per capita may be a future contender. A new study by the Brookings Institution identifies high-patent cities in this category, including Burlington, Vt.; Corvallis, Ore.; and Trenton, N.J.

Perhaps the next Microsoft will come from one of their inventors. "A resident living in one of the 100 most inventive metropolitan areas is seven times more likely to invent a patent than someone living in a lower ranked metropolitan area," the Brookings study concludes.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.