GDP comes in strong. But will 'fiscal cliff' slow growth?

The economy grew at a 2.7 percent pace in the third quarter, according to the latest GDP report, but the road ahead depends heavily on how politicians deal with the fiscal cliff.

Julie Jacobson/AP
Shoppers rummage through a pile of sweaters on sale at a J.C. Penney store, in Las Vegas, Nov. 23. The US economy grew at a 2.7 percent pace in this year's third quarter, a stronger showing than had originally been estimated.

The US economy grew at a 2.7 percent pace in this year's third quarter, a stronger showing than had originally been estimated.

The new tally, released Thursday, came after the Commerce Department had reported a month ago that the third-quarter growth rate was just 2 percent.

Although stronger growth is better than deceleration, the latest report on gross domestic product comes with two big caveats.

First, the upward revision came because of a spike in inventories – goods that were produced but not sold during the quarter. Yes, that stocking-up may have helped companies when those Black Friday shoppers rolled in, but that kind of gain can't be repeated quarter after quarter unless the production is matched by a rise in consumer demand.

Second, the road ahead depends heavily on dealing with the "fiscal cliff" – what President Obama and Congress do about the scheduled tax hikes and federal spending cuts that are poised to affect consumption in the new year.

"A slowing trend already looks likely in the fourth quarter due to storm disruptions and because business confidence has sunk to its lowest for a year, hit in particular by uncertainty caused by the looming fiscal cliff and ongoing worries about the euro zone crisis," economist Chris Williamson of Markit wrote in an analysis Thursday.

Even if the White House and Congress reach a deal that prevents steep tax hikes on consumers in January, that doesn't mean there will be no "cliff" effect. Negotiations in Washington are focused on a twofold goal: keeping the economy from being pushed suddenly into recession, while also laying a medium-term plan to reduce federal deficits.

Thus a fiscal bargain would probably include some tax hikes compared with current policy. That means some "austerity" for an economy that's not growing very fast.

The new third-quarter numbers, for example, show "final sales" to households and businesses rising at a 1.9 percent annual rate, adjusted for inflation. That's growth, but doesn't represent a buoyant recovery.

The pace of growth in the second quarter was just 1.3 percent, and the fourth quarter could come in at 1 to 2 percent, forecasters say.

Mr. Williamson says he doesn't expect the upward revision of third-quarter GDP to have any effect on Federal Reserve monetary policy. "Any renewed weakness ... will subdue hiring," he writes, meaning the Fed's efforts at monetary stimulus are "likely to remain in place for some time to come."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.