Standard Chartered shares plunge after Iran allegations

Standard Chartered market value plummeted by nearly $12.5 billion after the New York state regulator accused the UK bank of being involved in laundering money for Iran. The share price for  Standard Chartered tanked by 23 percent.

|
Sang Tan/AP
A man walks by the headquarter of Standard Chartered bank in London, Tuesday, Aug. 7, 2012. Shares in Standard Chartered PLC dropped sharply on Tuesday as investors reacted to U.S. charges that the bank was involved in laundering money for Iran. The charges against Standard Chartered were a shock for a bank which proudly described itself recently as "boring."

Standard Chartered PLC saw around 8 billion pounds ($12.5 billion) wiped off its market value Tuesday after the New York state regulator accused the U.K. bank of being involved in laundering money for Iran, dealing a further blow to the City of London's reputation as a financial center.

The charges against Standard Chartered were a shock for a bank which proudly described itself recently as "boring" — its share price tanked 23 percent to 11.33 pounds by early afternoon trading on the London Stock Exchange.

The falling share rice also affected the main FTSE 100 index in London, which was one of the only European leading indexes to trade lower — Standard Chartered makes up 1.5 percent of the index's overall market value. In Hong Kong, where the bank's shares are also listed, they finished 14.9 percent lower.

The storm surrounding Standard Chartered is the latest in a summer of scandals for the City of London — one of the world's leading financial centers. Bob Diamond, the chief executive of Barclays, was forced to step down after his bank was found to have manipulated a key interbank interest rate. HSBC has been fined for failing to stop money-laundering in Mexico and U.S. bank JPMorgan suffered a huge trading loss in its London office.

New York State Department of Financial Services alleged on Monday that Standard Chartered schemed with the Iranian government to launder $250 billion from 2001 to 2007, leaving the U.S. financial system "vulnerable to terrorists."

Standard Chartered said it "strongly rejects" the allegations. In a statement, the bank said "well over 99.9 percent" of the questioned transactions with Iran complied with all regulations, and the exceptions amounted to $14 million.

Last week, Standard Chartered' chief executive, Peter Sands, boasted that the bank has racked up a 10-year string of record first-half profits "amidst all the turbulence in the global economy and the apparently never-ending turmoil in the world of banking."

"It may seem boring in contrast to what is going on elsewhere, but we see some virtue in being boring," Sands added.

The New York regulator ordered Standard Chartered representatives to appear in New York City on Aug. 15 "to explain these apparent violations of law" and to demonstrate why its license to operate in the State of New York "should not be revoked."

Gary Greenwood, analyst at Shore Capital in London, said the possible revocation of the New York license was of far greater concern than any potential fine, which could run into hundreds of millions of dollars.

Standard Chartered's U.S. operation facilitates trade for customers that have operations in both the U.S. and emerging markets.

"Indeed, this is an area of the business that has been highlighted by management for growth," Greenwood said. "A loss of its U.S. banking license would not only jeopardize part of this profit stream, but the associated reputational damage could also have a severely damaging impact to its operations within emerging markets."

The New York agency alleged that Standard Chartered conspired with Iranian clients to route nearly 60,000 different U.S. dollar payments through Standard Chartered's New York branch "after first stripping information from wire transfer messages used to identify sanctioned countries, individuals and entities."

The New York regulators called the bank a rogue institution and quoted one of its executives as saying: "You (expletive) Americans. Who are you to tell us, the rest of the world, that we're not going to deal with Iranians."

The order also identifies an October 2006 "panicked message" from a London group executive director who worried the transactions could lead to "very serious or even catastrophic reputational damage to the group."

If proven, the scheme would violate state money-laundering laws. The order also accuses the bank of falsifying business records, obstructing governmental administration, failing to report misconduct to the state quickly, evading federal sanctions and other illegal acts.

Between 2004 and 2007, about half the period covered by the order, the department claims Standard Chartered hid from and lied about its Iranian transactions to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Before 2008, banks were allowed to transact some business with Iran, but only with full reporting and disclosure, the order states.

In 2008, the U.S. Treasury Department stopped those transactions because it suspected they helped pay for Iran to develop nuclear weapons and finance terrorist groups including Hamas and Hezbollah. The order states the bank has to provide information and answer questions to determine if any of the funding aided the groups or Iran's nuclear program.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Standard Chartered shares plunge after Iran allegations
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2012/0807/Standard-Chartered-shares-plunge-after-Iran-allegations
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe