A hard landing for China? Six top economists weigh in.

3. A 1 in 3 chance of a hard landing

Andy Wong/AP/File
In this file photo, Chinese President Hu Jintao, left, chats with Vice President Xi Jinping as they leave the Great Hall of the People after a closing ceremony of the National People's Congress. Xi is widely expected to be the country's future leader.

Alastair Newton, senior political analyst, Nomura:

There's a 1 in 3 probability of a ‘hard landing’ starting between now and the end of 2014 (where a ‘hard landing’ is defined as four consecutive quarters of growth at 5 percent or below);

  • The risk of such is skewed to the latter part of that period. Between now and mid-2013 China’s leaders will be firmly focused on ensuring a smooth economic trajectory around the political inflexion point of the handover of power to the fifth generation leadership;
  • They have plenty of firepower to ensure that that is so, even taking into account the possibility of a fairly sharp exogenous shock – although, clearly, a major exogenous shock (e.g. break-up of the eurozone, a military strike on Iran and consequent sustained oil price spike) could make keeping the economy on an even keel very difficult to impossible;
  • Beyond mid-2013 China’s leaders will need to address significant structural and systemic challenges, which will not be straightforward. However, since 1992 (i.e. Deng Xiaoping’s "nanxun" or inspection visit to southern China, which marked a speeding up in the nation's development), they have shown an impressive ability to steer the economy through very choppy waters.
3 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.