What Gay Talese has to teach us in an age of social media

The iconic magazine piece 'Frank Sinatra Has a Cold' has lessons – and surprises – for today's journalists.

Long before Twitter, Facebook, and TMZ documented a star’s every move, Gay Talese grabbed national attention by telling the world that Frank Sinatra had a cold.

In the age of the Internet and social media, we’ve grown accustomed to idea that everything a celebrity does or thinks or experiences is news.

But in 1966, long before Twitter, Facebook, and TMZ documented a star’s every move, Gay Talese grabbed national attention by telling the world that Frank Sinatra had a cold.

Or so we’re reminded in “High Notes,” a new book that collects the best of Talese’s journalism from more than six decades at the keyboard.

Talese rose to fame in the 1960s as a pioneer of New Journalism, a style of reportage in which the writer didn’t so much chronicle his subject as inhabit it, braiding a narrative from copious observation, immersive detail, and long-form storytelling. Talese’s topics have included gangsters and boxers, baseball players and newspapermen,  engineers, bridge builders, and restaurateurs.

But nothing Talese wrote has become as durably remembered as his 1966 article for Esquire, reprinted in “High Notes,” called “Frank Sinatra Has a Cold.” The magazine had sent Talese to Los Angeles to profile the singer, who through his publicist declined to be interviewed, claiming he was under the weather with a cold.

Whether it was really a cold – or cold feet about speaking to the press – that kept Sinatra away from Talese, the writer couldn’t say. But instead of giving up and leaving town, Talese continued the assignment without the singer’s direct cooperation, learning what he could about Sinatra from watching him closely and interviewing those around him.

The result was masterful, revealing Sinatra in a way that a conventional interview could not – for the simple reason that sometimes, other people know us even better than we do.

The story, widely anthologized, is often used in writing classes to illustrate how much can be learned by carefully watching and listening, even when a subject seems, at first glance, not very promising.

“Frank Sinatra Has a Cold” has become so iconic, in fact, that Talese wrote a later piece, also included in “High Notes,” that explains how he pulled the piece off. In “On Writing ‘Frank Sinatra Has a Cold,’” Talese details the research that went into the assignment. He stayed in Los Angeles several weeks, “ran up expenses close to $5,000, returned to New York, and then took another six weeks to organize and write a fifty-page article that was largely drawn from a two-hundred page chronicle that represented interviews with more than one hundred people....”

Now that the media universe has splintered and the economics of journalism has changed, few magazines would be willing to finance the travel and legwork needed for a piece like “Frank Sinatra Has a Cold,” Talese tells readers.

“The road has become too expensive,” he writes with an almost audible sigh. “The writer is home.”

– Danny Heitman, a columnist for The Advocate newspaper in Louisiana, is the author of “A Summer of Birds: John James Audubon at Oakley House.”               

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What Gay Talese has to teach us in an age of social media
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today