Want an Ivy League education? Read these books.

What are Ivy League students reading that the rest of us aren't? More British literature and more philosophy.

Melanie Stetson Freeman/staff/file
Students chat outside a classroom building at Columbia University in Morningside Heights in Upper Manhattan, on May 6, 2015 in New York, N.Y.

Want an Ivy League education without an Ivy League price tag?

You can come close thanks to the recent release of the Open Syllabus Explorer, an online database of books assigned in over 1 million college courses over the past 15 years.

"[W]ith more than 1 million syllabi in the database, it's currently the best approximation we have for what students are actually reading in college – and for the books that are informing the leaders of tomorrow," writes The Washington Post.

It turns out college students across the board are reading a lot of Plato, Hobbes, Machiavelli, and Aristotle. Many of the books assigned at US colleges and universities draw from the Western canon, perhaps not surprisingly. Students are also reading more books in the humanities, perhaps because science and engineering classes usually assign fewer titles.

But when you drill in a bit deeper, differences emerge between all schools surveyed and Ivy League schools.

Christopher Ingraham at The Washington Post tallied the most frequently assigned books at all US colleges and universities and compared them with the books assigned at seven Ivy League schools: Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Cornell, Columbia, U. Penn, and Brown. (Dartmouth doesn't seem to appear in the database.)

First, here's what students at both Ivies and other schools are reading: Strunk & White's classic writing guide, "The Elements of Style"; Plato's "The Republic"; Thomas Hobbes' "Leviathan"; and Machiavelli's "The Prince."

From there, the lists diverged. Whereas Campbell Biology textbook, Marx & Engels' "The Communist Manifesto," Sophocles' "Oedipus," and Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley's "Frankenstein" appeared on the "All Schools" list, they were missing on the Ivy League schools' list of most commonly read books.

So what are Ivy League students reading that the rest of us aren't? Samuel Huntington's "The Clash of Civilizations" appears at No. 2 on the Ivy League list. Other books include Alexis de Tocqueville's "Democracy in America," John Rawls' "A Theory of Justice," Martin Luther King's "Letter from a Birmingham Jail," John Stuart Mill's "On Liberty," and Robert Axelrod's "The Evolution of Cooperation."

"Overall, the Ivy League list is heavily skewed toward political philosophy and thought – the only book on the list that doesn't fall under this category is Strunk and White's 'Elements of Style,'" writes The Washington Post.

When it comes to English books, it's a similar story. There's some overlap – Shelley's "Frankenstein," Geoffrey Chaucer's "Canterbury Tales," John Milton's "Paradise Lost," and Shakespeare's "Hamlet" make appearances on both lists.

But they differ in important ways. Whereas the most popular English books across all schools included T.S. Eliot's "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock," Charlotte Perkins Gilman's "The Yellow Wallpaper," and Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Young Goodman Brown," Ivies were assigning Jane Austen's "Persuasion," Edmund Spenser's "The Faerie Queene," and Thomas Kyd's "The Spanish Tragedy."

"[A]cross all schools, works by American authors ... are more commonly assigned than at the Ivies, where British authors are more prominent," the Post notes.

The bottom line: Approximating an Ivy League education may be as easy as checking out the right books at the library.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Want an Ivy League education? Read these books.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today