'A God in Ruins,' Kate Atkinson's 'Life After Life' follow-up, receives mostly positive reviews

'God' centers on 'Life' protagonist Ursula's brother Teddy, a World War II veteran. Atkinson's 'Life' was highly acclaimed.

'A God in Ruins' is by Kate Atkinson.

A companion novel to Kate Atkinson’s highly acclaimed 2013 novel “Life After Life” has been released and is garnering mainly positive reviews. 

“A God in Ruins” centers on “Life” protagonist Ursula’s brother and World War II soldier Teddy, who returns from the war and starts a family. The novel follows him, his children, and grandchildren as they live through the twentieth century.

The novel was released on May 5 and was selected as one of the best books of the month by both the Monitor and Amazon. Monitor staff called it “powerful.” The book is also the May selection for NPR's Morning Edition book club.

Publishers Weekly and Kirkus Reviews both gave the novel positive reviews, with PW writing that, “as in ‘Life After Life,’ Atkinson isn’t just telling a story: she’s deconstructing, taking apart the notion of how we believe stories are told. Using narrative tricks that range from the subtlest sleight of hand to direct address, she makes us feel the power of storytelling not as an intellectual conceit, but as a punch in the gut.”

Kirkus Reviews found the book to be “imaginative…. A grown-up, elegant fairy tale, at least of a kind, with a humane vision of people in all their complicated splendor.” 

New York Times critic Janet Maslin was also won over, writing that the book makes the reader recall “what a big, old-school novel can do…. almost inexhaustibly rich in scenes and characters and incidents. It deploys the whole realist bag of tricks, and none of it feels fake or embarrassing. In fact, it’s a masterly and frequently exhilarating performance by a novelist who seems utterly undaunted by the imposing challenges she’s set for herself.”

There is reportedly some sort of twist in the last pages of “God” and NPR critic Tasha Robinson was disappointed by it, though she enjoyed the rest of the book.

“It's a disappointingly familiar literary trope that feels like an afterthought when it emerges abruptly,” she wrote, and she also noted that “scenes … sometimes connect … and sometimes seem disjointed, even random…. But Atkinson connects with [Teddy’s grandchild] Sunny's emotions so closely, and with the specifics of his story so naturally, that even the most seemingly irrelevant byways become entertaining…. [T]he book's strengths come from a scale that dwarfs even Life After Life's seemingly infinite possibilities. Both novels spread across generations, tracking the changes decades bring to societies and individuals. Both delve deeply into the experience of war, the pain of the aftermath, and the way history casually swallows so many deeply personal details.” 

Not every critic, however, compared the novel favorably to its predecessor. Los Angeles Times writer Carolyn Kellogg wrote that it “doesn’t live up to the promise of its predecessor.” 

“Teddy is surrounded by far less appealing characters in ‘A God in Ruins,’” Kellogg wrote. “All of the emotion of the novel has pooled at the end.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.