J.K. Rowling stays positive in her Twitter discussion with a fan

When a fan questioned Rowling's statement that she envisioned 'Harry Potter' character Dumbledore as gay, the author replied that 'gay people just look like ... people.' 'Amazing answer,' the fan replied.

Dan Hallman/Invision/AP
J.K. Rowling is the author of the 'Harry Potter' novels and the Cormoran Strike series, among other works.

Harry Potter” author J.K. Rowling recently interacted with a fan on Twitter who had a question about a character’s sexuality. 

Rowling revealed after the seventh and final “Potter” book was published that she envisioned wise wizard Albus Dumbledore, who acts as a mentor to Harry, as gay. A fan recently tweeted at Rowling, writing, “I wonder why you said that Dumbledore is a gay because I can’t see him in that way.” (The tweet has now been deleted.)

Rowling replied,

The interaction was interesting because it wasn’t just another case of a fan criticizing an author, particularly over the often controversial topic of sexuality. Because the user who tweeted at Rowling deleted his or her side of the conversation, many missed the reply by the user, who told Rowling, “Amazing answer.... Yes you are absolutely right. Such an inspiration!!!” 

Rowling herself stressed how positive the interaction was, pointing her Twitter followers to an article in The Independent, which included the user’s reply to her.

Since releasing the last “Potter” book, Rowling has released the novel “The Casual Vacancy” and the first two books in what she says will be a series about private detective Cormoran Strike, which she initially published under a pseudonym. The writer is also working on the screenplay for a movie adaptation of her book “Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them,” which takes place in the “Potter” world and will follow a wizard living decades before Harry.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.