Terry Pratchett: Collection of early stories wins over critics

Pratchett recently released a collection of his early stories, which reviewers found to be 'charming' and 'rollicking.'

Jon Furniss/Invision/AP
Terry Pratchett holds his trophy for Best Single Documentary award at the 2007 BAFTA TV Awards.

Bestselling fantasy author Terry Pratchett has released a collection of some of his early stories.

“Dragons at Crumbling Castle,” which is meant for middle-grade readers and was published on Feb. 3, consists of various tales by Pratchett that were published in the 1960s, long before he became the genre legend that he is today. Pratchett, who is behind such works as “Night Watch,” “The Color of Magic,” and “Raising Steam,” among others, was the bestselling writer in England before J.K. Rowling of “Harry Potter” fame came along, according to NPR.

Pratchett’s new collection is earning mainly positive reviews so far. Publishers Weekly wrote of the book, “Though these stories lack the perfectly timed wordplay of Pratchett’s later work, they are a charming and funny sample of his early fictional imaginings. Accompanied by Beech’s wiry Quentin Blake-like illustrations, as well as numerous typographical flourishes, this volume will please both its intended audience and older Pratchett completists.”

Kirkus Reviews was also won over by the book, calling it “rollicking….  The author admits to some minor editorial massaging, but these [stories] feature characters heroic or hiss-worthy, pranks and battles aplenty, sly twists on familiar tropes and his trademark mix of silly humor and acute moral commentary…. Juvenilia from a genius, showing bright signs of future masterworks.”

And NPR writer Tasha Robinson called the book “an enjoyable look at an early talent.”

“The Crumbling Castle stories are still antic and entertaining, with a sense they were written in stream-of-consciousness bursts, as unfettered exercises in imagination and positivity,” Robinson wrote. “They're airy, energetic and goofy.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.