'What If' continues to draw critical praise, stays strong on sales charts

'What If?' by Randall Munroe addresses strange science questions and the book continues to be a bestseller, also earning some end-of-the-year critical praise.

'What If?' is by Randall Munroe.

Randall Munroe’s book “What If?,” about offbeat science questions, continues to be critically praised and is holding steady on bestseller lists.

Munroe, a former NASA researcher, is also the creator of the webcomic xkcd and his book consists of him answering some of the oddest science-based questions he’s received, including “Could you build a jetpack using downward-firing machine guns?” and “From what height would you need to drop a steak for it to be cooked when it hit the ground?” 

The book was released this past September and was named to Amazon’s best of the month list. Amazon editorial director Sara Nelson called it “irresistible.” 

At the time of its publication, “What If?” earned other critical praise, too. NPR called it “catchy and approachable” and the Wall Street Journal found it to be “consistently fascinating and entertaining.” 

At least one publication remembered it for the end of the year, too. Entertainment Weekly named the title one of the 10 best nonfiction titles of 2014, with writer Kyle Anderson writing of the book, “Extreme astrophysics and indecipherable chemistry have rarely been this clearly explained or this consistently hilarious. 

Meanwhile, “What If?” is still a champion of the sales charts. The book debuted at number one on the IndieBound hardcover nonfiction bestseller list for the week of Sept. 7 and has stayed on the hardcover nonfiction bestseller list every week since. It’s currently at number five on the list for the week of Dec. 18.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.