'Prince Lestat' sells well, but many critics find the book confusing

Anne Rice's return to the world of vampires has been selling well, but some readers are finding the mythology of the book too complicated.

'Prince Lestat' is by Anne Rice.

Anne Rice’s latest novel about the world of vampires, “Prince Lestat,” is selling well but has received mixed reviews from critics. 

“Lestat” was first published on Oct. 28, In it, Rice revisits the character of Lestat, who appeared in other Rice novels, including “Interview with the Vampire.” Rice had previously stated that her 2003 book “Blood Canticle” would be the last book in her "Vampire Chronicles" series, but “Lestat” centers on a blood-sucking world where iPods are accessible. 

The novel has been doing well in sales, ranking number nine on the New York Times print and e-book fiction bestseller list for the week of Nov. 23 and coming in at number four on the IndieBound bestseller list for the week of Nov. 13. And “Lestat” has received some praise from critics, with Amazon naming it as one of the best books of October and Barnes & Noble writing in its review that “Prince Lestat is no quiet swan song. It ripples with suspense and excitement.” Kirkus Reviews found it “talky [and] inconsequential" but otherwise "good, old-fashioned fanged fun.”

However, other reviewers have complained that it was too difficult to remember the various characters and plotlines, with Boston Globe critic Meredith Goldstein writing that “it helps to have a laptop handy so that you can quickly Google characters and events…. Once caught up, it’s possible to roll with Rice’s sprawling story if you’re a longtime fan – less so if you’re not”. Louise Welsh of the Guardian noted that “even the brat prince’s superpowers cannot hinge its many plot strands and voices together…. [T]he reader [is] lost.” Publishers Weekly also complained of the long passages of exposition, calling them “bone-dry.”

And New York Times critic Terrence Rafferty simply found the book “dreadful.” 

“Rice’s queenly prose is unaltered,” he wrote. “Time cannot wither nor custom stale its infinite monotony…. [But] ‘Prince Lestat’ requires a ton of supplementary material even to be comprehensible." Rafferty did admit, however, that  "[I]t has to be said that the earnestness with which Rice continues to toil at her brand of pop sorcery has an odd, retro sort of charm.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Prince Lestat' sells well, but many critics find the book confusing
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today