No bombshells in Bush bio '41,' but some rare glimpses of both father and son

Although he evades some details, George W. Bush infuses his biography of his father with love – and offers some interesting insights. 

A surprising admission in George W. Bush's '41': the younger Bush did not consult his father about running for governor in Texas in 1994, running for president in 2000, or going to war in Iraq in 2003.

Readers looking for major political revelations, presidential secrets, and insider accounts in George W. Bush's biography of his father, "41: A Portrait of My Father," will be disappointed.

And yet, according to reviews, "41" is so personally persuasive as an emotional introspection and as an affectionate portrait of George H.W. Bush, the political details – including whether or not brother Jeb will run for president – will hardly be missed.

As Bush 43 describes it in the book's jacket summary, "41" is primarily "a love story – a personal portrait of the extraordinary man who I am blessed to call my dad," a point that The New York Times and Wall Street Journal echo in their reviews.

The Times' Michiko Kakutani calls it "an affectionate portrait of the 41st president that’s short on factual revelations and long on emotion."

At its best, the book is "folksy, sharply observed and surprisingly affecting, especially for someone not exactly known for introspection," writes Kakutani. At its worst, it is "transparent [in its] efforts to spin or sidestep important questions about his own time in office."

As a personal account, rather than a political one, "41" offers a surprisingly nuanced portrait of the elder Bush, and if readers read between the lines, insights into the life and mind of the younger Bush, as well.

The book covers the major highlights of the life of the senior Bush, now in his 90s and with a "fading memory" – his military service in World War II, his political rise as a Congressman, then CIA director, vice president, and president, as well as his strengths as a statesman known for his diplomacy and as a husband and father known for his warmth and humor.

It excels in its exploration of the seemingly trivial personal details that provide insight into Bush 41.

Like the fact that "Bush senior was unfailingly kind to the stewards, Secret Service agents, cooks – anyone who worked at the White House," as the Wall Street Journal's Fred Barnes writes. "While he was CIA director in the late 1970s, he took the employee elevator, not the one reserved for the director.... He hated what he called 'bigshot-itis.'"

Or the fact that the elder Bush liked to send corny jokes to the younger Bush to buoy his son’s spirits while he was president.

"[I]t is the examination of the senior Bush’s character that is unique and valuable," writes the Journal, which it says makes "41" "such a joy to read."

Perhaps most interesting, however, is the book's revelations about the relationship between father and son.

At first glance, the pair couldn't be more dissimilar:

"Whereas Bush senior was famous for his self-effacing New England manners and quiet diplomacy, Bush junior became known as a proud, outspoken gut player, with Texas swagger," writes the Times' Kakutani. "Whereas Bush senior’s policies were grounded in foreign policy realism and old-school Republican moderation, Bush junior’s tilted toward neoconservatism and a drive to export democracy and remake the world."

Those differences appeared to play out in their political decisions and governing styles.

“On everything from taxes to Iraq,” the New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd wrote in 2002, “the son has tried to use his father’s failures in the eyes of conservatives as a reverse playbook.”

Hence Bush 43's decision to invade Iraq in 2003 and topple its leader, Saddam Hussein, whom the elder Bush deliberately refrained from targeting.

Various political observers have theorized over the years that the younger Bush often felt overshadowed by his father. "And they have speculated that, as president, he was driven to outdo his dad by taking Saddam Hussein down for good, and by winning a second term," the Times adds, "arguments the Bush family has dismissed as psychobabble."

Still, hints of an Oedipal relationship are fascinating and may explain some oddly revealing details Bush makes in the book.

For example, Bush Jr. freely admits that he didn't consult his father about running for governor in Texas in 1994, nor did he consult him about running for president in 2000, nor did he consult him about going to war in Iraq in 2003. It's a revelation that some may perceive as strange, considering the elder Bush's position as both Bush 43's father and a former president with excellent foreign policy credentials as well as experience invading Iraq.

Nonetheless, as the Times writes, "The oddly dysfunctional inability of father and son to discuss policy and politics – out of fear, it seems, of meddling or stepping on each other’s toes – is a recurrent theme in this book."

As such, "41" is indeed revealing. No, readers will find no political bombshells or tell-all gossip. What they will find is a deeply personal account of Bush 41 and a rare glimpse of Bush 43 as introspective son and biographer, at turns "jokey and sentimental, irreverent and sincere."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.