Ebola thriller 'The Hot Zone' is back in the spotlight

Richard Preston's book 'The Hot Zone' was published in 1994 and tells the story of Ebola appearing in a lab in Washington D.C. Now it's back on bestseller lists and it could be adapted as a TV series.

'The Hot Zone' is by Richard Preston.

With Ebola in the headlines, Richard Preston’s nonfiction thriller “The Hot Zone” is back on bestseller lists – and possibly coming to TV.

Preston first published “Zone,” a book about the first time Ebola was seen, in 1994. It’s now back on the New York Times bestseller list, coming in at number 13 on the Combined Print and E-Book Nonfiction list for Oct. 26, and it’s currently ranked at number 28 on Amazon

At the time of its initial release, Stephen King called the book “one of the most horrifying things I've ever read. What a remarkable piece of work,” and Publishers Weekly called the book “horrifying and riveting,” while School Library Journal wrote that it is a “fast-paced medical chiller right to the last disturbing page.”

The author also told the New York Times that he’s “dying to update the book.” 

“I want to make the clinical picture of the virus more clear and accurate,” he said. “In the original 'Hot Zone,' I have a description of a nurse weeping tears of blood. That almost certainly didn’t happen. When a person has Ebola, the eyes can turn brilliant red from blood vessels leaking and blood oozing out of the eyelid. That’s horrifying, but it’s not someone with tears of blood running down their face. I want to fix that. The other thing that’s happening with Ebola today is there have been more outbreaks, and virologists are constructing a tree showing how they are related. The names of the viruses and the relationships have changed, and I want to get that into ‘The Hot Zone.’ Finally, I’m going to put in an introduction in which I place the story of ‘The Hot Zone’ in today’s context.” 

Meanwhile, “Zone” could be coming to the small screen. According to the Hollywood Reporter, director and producer Ridley Scott and producer Lynda Obst could possibly adapt the book as a limited series for Fox TV Studios.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.