Is J.K. Rowling building a real-life version of Hagrid's hut?

According to reports, a building that's being constructed on Rowling's property has 'a striking resemblance' to the home of 'Potter' character Hagrid, who lived in a hut on the grounds of the magic school Hogwarts in Rowling's novels.

Courtesy of Warner Bros. Entertainment
Rubeus Hagrid (portrayed by Robbie Coltrane, l.) and Hermione Granger (played by Emma Watson, second from l.), Harry Potter (portrayed by Daniel Radcliffe, second from r.) and Ron Weasley (played by Rupert Grint, r.) stand in Hagrid's hut.

Is “Harry Potter” author J.K. Rowling having a structure built on her property that looks like the residence of “Potter” character Hagrid?

According to the Telegraph, the writer is having a “stone-built summerhouse [that bears] a striking resemblance to the home” of the “Potter” character Rubeus Hagrid, who is the gamekeeper at Harry’s school Hogwarts and lives in a one-room stone structure on the school’s grounds.

The structure would reportedly be on Rowling’s Killiechassie Estate in Scotland.

Rowling did not comment on the project, according to the Independent.

The author is behind the screenplay for the upcoming movie “Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them,” a short book which Rowling wrote in the mode of a textbook for Harry and his friends. The movie, which will be released in 2016, according to a Warner Bros. press release and will follow the adventures of the fictitious "Fantastic" author Newt Scamander, will serve as the beginning of a planned trilogy. The second and third “Fantastic” movies will be released in 2018 and 2020. Meanwhile, Warner Bros. CEO Kevin Tsujihara said the series will be “at least a trilogy,” according to the Los Angeles Times.

Rowling is also behind a new series based in our own world and which centers on private investigator Cormoran Strike and his secretary Robin. She publishes the series, which is currently comprised of the books “The Cuckoo’s Calling” and “The Silkworm,” under the pen name Robert Galbraith. “Silkworm” was released this past summer and soon after its publication, Rowling said that the series would have “more” than seven titles, the amount of books that made up her “Potter” series. “I don't know that I've got an end point in mind,” she said, according to the BBC

Monitor fiction critic Yvonne Zipp wrote that “Silkworm” has “a corkscrewing plot and a clever use of both Jacobean revenge dramas and the book-within-a-book plot device. In addition to the mystery, Rowling also wryly sends up the publishing industry… The plot could have used a little tightening in the second half, but "The Silkworm" is a highly entertaining read. Above all, Rowling is a storyteller with a terrific imagination, and she employs both to good effect.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.