Print books are outselling digital by a healthy margin

In the first half of 2014, according to a Nielsen Books & Consumer survey, print book sales were more than twice those of digital.

Nikki Fox/Daily News-Record/AP
A library volunteer sorts books in Virginia. “There's a deeply implanted desire and understanding and wanting of [print] books,” Stephen King told HuffPost Live.

Naysayers lamenting the death of print have been proven wrong – again.

A new Nielsen Books & Consumer survey shows that not only is print alive and well, print books are outselling digital books by a healthy margin.

E-books constituted only 23 percent of unit sales for the first six months of the year, according to Nielsen’s survey, while hardcovers made up 25 percent and paperback 42 percent of sales. In other words, overall print book sales made up 67 percent of sales, more than twice as much as e-books.

The months and years following the launch of the Kindle saw explosive growth in e-reading. In the first six months of 2011, e-reader ownership doubled, and growth was in the triple digits. Digital books were changing the reading landscape, including what readers read, how they read, and where. Observers predicted digital books would save the publishing industry, and forecasted the death of print books.

It turns out those fears were little more than "sky is falling" hyperbole.

E-books sales growth has slowed to the single digits, leaving print books dominant, according to Nielsen.

Now publishing insiders are forecasting a new future, one in which print and digital books coexist. 

"I believe the reader of 2020 or 2030 will have two libraries, print and digital, with different types of books and publications in each," Scott Pack, publisher at HarperCollins imprint The Friday Project, told the UK’s Independent. "While I have no qualms about trying out a debut author on e-book or loading up some holiday reading on to my Kindle, when it comes to my favorite authors I have to own the print edition, and I remain a sucker for a beautifully designed and printed book."

At Electric Literature, Lincoln Michel anticipates a richer reading future.

“The so-called 'format wars' may turn out not to be a war at all. Instead, we may see that the various formats can work together to expand literature and create more readers and markets,” Michel writes.

Why the enduring love for print?

Studies have shown that print books enable deeper reading than digital, as well as better understanding and memory recall.

One study gave 50 readers a story to read, half on a Kindle and half on a paperback, then tested the readers on various measures, including characters, plot, and setting. It found print readers reported “higher measures having to do with empathy and transportation and immersion, and narrative coherence” than digital readers, according to the study’s lead researcher Anne Mangen of Norway’s Stavanger University.

Of course, there’s also the good old-fashioned love for the “book smell” and the rustle of pages, as well as collecting books for one’s bookshelves.

And of course, print has endured far more than the advent of digital, says bestselling author Stephen King.

"Books have been around for three, four centuries,” he told HuffPost Live. “There's a deeply implanted desire and understanding and wanting of books.”

In other words, print books aren’t going anywhere.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Print books are outselling digital by a healthy margin
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today