Amtrak announces its writers' residency participants

After a writer floated the idea of an authors' residency program on trains, Amtrak has invited 24 writers to ride the rails.

Amtrak/PR Newswire
Amtrak has selected 24 members of the literary community as the first group of writers to participate in the Amtrak Residency program.

Amtrak has announced the 24 writers that will be participating in the company’s writers’ residency program.

As we reported earlier this year, writer Alexander Chee brought up during an interview the idea of a residency for writers by Amtrak because he said one of his favorite places to work was on a train. Writers Jessica Gross and Zach Seward tweeted a link of the story to Amtrak’s account and the company wrote back, saying, “We’d need a test run. You two up for a trip to Chicago and back?” 

Now Amtrak has announced other participants.

“Over the next year, they will work on writing projects of their choice in the unique workspace of a long-distance train,” the Amtrak blog reads. “The 24 residents offer a diverse representation of the writing community and hail from across the country.”

Those who will be taking the journeys include Gothamist deputy editor Jen Carlson, SETT co-founder Tynan, author Ksenia Anske, author Karen Karbo, sports blogger Craig Calcaterra, and movie critic Lisa Schwarzbaum.

According to Amtrak’s site, they received more than 16,000 applications for the residencies. Chee, Amtrak vice president of government affairs Joe McHugh, Random House editor Samuel Nicholson, and National Endowment for the Arts director of literature Amy Stolls judged the entries.

The blog further detailed the company’s vision for the program.

“What started as a casual mention in an interview and a tweet from a freelancer writer back in December, has turned into a program that Amtrak is truly honored to be a part of,” the blog reads. “We are excited for the 24 residents to experience the beauty of long-distance train travel and hopefully find inspiration for their writing along the way.” 

Readers, if the program continued, would you apply to get some writing done on a trip across the country?

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Amtrak announces its writers' residency participants
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today