'Station Eleven' presents a more positive view of a post-disaster world

While Mandel doesn't shy away from depicting the difficulties of post-disaster life in her new novel, reviewers are noting that her book, unlike many other apocalyptic tales, presents the survival of art forms like theater and music. 

'Station Eleven' is by Emily St. John Mandel.

The novel “Station Eleven” by Emily St. John Mandel, which focuses on the time before, during, and after a flu pandemic, isn’t just getting attention for its positive reviews – it’s also being noted for its positive portrayal of life post-illness.

“Station,” which was published on Sept. 9, first focuses on a theater performance where an actor dies during the middle of production, then centers on an EMT who watches as almost the entire world is killed by an illness called the Georgia Flu. The book then fast-forwards to 15 years later, when an actress travels with an acting troupe to perform plays and music for those who are still alive. 

Post-apocalyptic scenarios are rarely positive – take, to name only two examples, the classic novel “The Road” by Cormac McCarthy and the blockbuster young adult series “The Hunger Games.” But reviewers are noting that Mandel’s book embraces a different view while still depicting how difficult living would be in a desolate world.

The novel was named as one of Amazon’s best books of September, with editorial director Sara Nelson calling it “kind of touching because it's also about what survives – music and plays.” 

Of the book itself, New York Times critic Sigrid Nunez wrote, “Mandel is an able and exuberant story­teller, and many readers will be won over by her nimble interweaving of her characters’ lives and fates.” Of its view of a post-disaster world, however, Nunez noted that “the book falters… in its imagination of disaster… the survivors do not think, act or speak like people struck by such a cataclysm… readers may wonder why few bad guys appear to have made it to Year 20.” However, Nunez concluded, “If ‘Station Eleven’ reveals little insight into the effects of extreme terror and misery on humanity, it offers comfort and hope to those who believe, or want to believe, that doomsday can be survived, that in spite of everything people will remain good at heart, and that when they start building a new world they will want what was best about the old.”

Karen Valby of Entertainment Weekly awarded the novel an A and wrote that the book is “not a story of crisis and survival. It's one of art and family and memory and community and the awful courage it takes to look upon the world with fresh and hopeful eyes,” while Publishers Weekly wrote that Mandel “finds a unique point of departure from which to examine civilization’s wreckage… St. John Mandel’s examination of the connections between individuals with disparate destinies makes a case for the worth of even a single life.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.