David Mitchell's 'The Bone Clocks' is the novel to watch this fall

'The Bone Clocks' isn't out until early September, but the novel by 'Cloud Atlas' author Mitchell is already drawing almost universal praise.

'The Bone Clocks' is by David Mitchell.

“The Bone Clocks,” the upcoming book by “Cloud Atlas” author David Mitchell, isn’t due out until September, but it already has the literary world buzzing.

“Clocks,” which will be released on Sept. 2, follows characters that include teenager Holly, who is sensitive to psychic occurrences and leaves home, and a reporter on the conflict in Iraq. Mitchell’s other works besides “Cloud Atlas” include the 2010 book “The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet” and the 1999 novel “Ghostwritten.”

His newest book has already been longlisted for the Man Booker Prize (the author has been nominated multiple times before) and has received starred reviews in such publications as Publishers Weekly (PW also named it to their list of the season’s top 10 works of literary fiction) and Kirkus Reviews as well as being selected by Library Journal as an Editor’s Pick.

Publishers Weekly wrote of the book, “From gritty realism to far-out fantasy, each section has its own charm and surprises. With its wayward thoughts, chance meetings, and attention to detail, Mitchell's (The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet) novel is a thing of beauty.” Kirkus Reviews called it “Another exacting, challenging and deeply rewarding novel from … Mitchell…. Speculative, lyrical and unrelentingly dark – trademark Mitchell, in other words.” 

Meanwhile, NPR called the book “a treat for long-time fans and people who've never picked up one of his books before…. a deft and entertaining mix of literary fiction and fantasy” and Louise Jury of The Independent wrote that the author is “a consummate craftsman…. For sci-fi fantasists, the imaginary world Mitchell creates might be a thing of wonder, a Dungeons and Dragons for literate grown-ups. For others, I suspect the flesh and blood anguish of a long life lived well against the odds will prove the greater pleasure.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.