Hillary Clinton's 'Hard Choices': Here's what the reviews are saying

Hillary Clinton's memoir 'Hard Choices' was released on June 10. What are critics saying about the book?

Susan Walsh/AP
Hillary Clinton speaks after receiving the 2013 Lantos Human Rights Prize during a ceremony on Capitol Hill in Washington.

Hillary Clinton’s new book “Hard Choices” has been endlessly examined for hints about whether she’ll be running for president in 2016.

But how is it simply as a book – something that might tempt you to put your feet up and peruse?

Reviews of “Choices,” which was published on June 10, have so far been mostly positive. New York Times critic Michiko Kakutani called it “a subtle, finely calibrated work.”

“Though she does not possess the genial explanatory gifts of her husband (showcased in his 2011 book about the economy, 'Back to Work'), [Hillary Clinton] provides the lay reader – and potential voter – with succinct and often shrewd appraisals of the complex web of political, economic and historical forces in play around the world, and the difficulties American leaders face in balancing strategic concerns with ‘core values,’” Kakutani wrote. “The tone is calm and measured, with occasional humorous asides… For readers who are less policy-oriented, there are personal tidbits strewn lightly throughout.”

Los Angeles Times writer Robin Abcarian found the book a “compelling chronicle." 

“Clinton's blunt charm goes hand-in-hand with an impressive sang-froid,” Abcarian wrote. “The prose of ‘Hard Choices’ may not have the soaring quality of a transcendent political speech… but it's also mercifully free of the bromides that mar most campaign biographies… The book teems with small, entertaining details about her interactions with foreign leaders.”

Meanwhile, Washington Post writer David Ignatius called the book “clear and at times riveting.”

“This is a careful book, written tactically to burnish friendships and avoid making enemies,” Ignatius wrote. “There are times when the reader feels he is being ‘spun’ rather than enlightened… There’s nothing here that seems likely to get her in trouble with anyone, which is doubtless good politics but a bad thing to say about a memoir… The book opens with an unfortunate gush of clichés… But once Clinton gets rolling, she does what’s most valuable in this kind of memoir, which is to take readers inside her meetings — sketching portraits of the world leaders with whom she did business.”

And the Guardian critic Ed Pilkington also found the book to be “carefully crafted." 

“In her portrayal of her four years at the State Department, Clinton comes across as a faithful servant, but one with her own firm sense of America’s role in the world,” Pilkington wrote. “Between the lines, she allows herself plenty of wriggle room in which to distance her record from that of the Obama White House, should she need to in 2016.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.