Can books help to redeem prisoners?

Italy follows Brazil in offering a chance for prisoners to reduce their sentences by reading.

Dado Galdieri/AP
“Reading is an extraordinary antidote to unhappiness and promotes awareness and social and personal redemption,” says an Italian prison official. Italy is offering prisoners reduced sentences in exchange for reading, modeling a program available in Brazilian prisons since 2012.

Are books the answer to prison problems?

Italy seems to think so. The Italian region of Calabria recently approved a bill that would reward inmates who read with reduced sentences: Three days for each book read.

How’s that for the redemptive power of reading?

“Reading is an extraordinary antidote to unhappiness and promotes awareness and social and personal redemption,” Calabria’s culture representative, Mario Culigiuri, told the UK’s Independent.

The program would cap slashed sentences at 48 days per year, or 16 books in 12 months.

Italy has the second-worst prison overcrowding in Europe, after Serbia, according to the Council of Europe’s annual prison report.

Officials in Calabria hope the prison reading program will cut down overcrowding, promotes literacy, and empowers and enlightens inmates.

It may sound like a tall order, but Italy isn’t the first to roll out such a program. The government of Brazil introduced its “Redemption through Reading” program in 2012, which allows inmates to shave four days off their sentence for every book read, with a maximum of 48 days per year.

And as we pointed out in an earlier post on the trend, even US District Judges are handing down similar stipulations, allowing inmates eager to shorten their sentences a way out through books.

The Calabrian prison reading program comes in the wake of controversy in the UK over a book ban in British prisons that restricts materials coming into jails there, including books. That book ban has incited worldwide protest.

These two approaches provide an interesting juxtaposition: books as both problem, and solution.

We’re more inclined to the latter approach, and though we’re not yet convinced that reading promotes rehabilitation, and how, we’re intrigued to see how this program progresses.   

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.