Trio of authors recall how they investigated dark family secrets

Three writers – Emma Brockes, author of 'She Left Me the Gun'; David Berg, author of 'Run Brother Run'; and Michael Hainey, author of 'After Visiting Friends' – all investigated dark areas from their families' pasts.

For all three of their titles, author Emma Brockes, David Berg, and Michael Hainey investigated their families' pasts.

Emma Brockes's mother stood up against family abuse as a child in South Africa. Michael Hainey's father died mysteriously, and a code of silence obscured the truth for decades. A hitman robbed David Berg's brother of his life, leaving a legacy of guilt, fury, and regret.
 
These tales of mother, father, and brother are littered with secrets and shame. But in the hands of the survivors they've left behind, storytellers all, heartbreak gives way way to heft and meaning, healing, and humor.
 
The family memoirs written by Brockes, Hainey and Berg – all published last year – are among the most remarkable books of the decade, full of deep voyages to times and places. Texas, South Africa, Chicago, Arkansas, England. The 1950s, the 1960s, and everything between then and now.

 
"Nobody gets through this life without tragedy," Berg says. "The question is: Does the tragedy define you? Or do you define the tragedy and get through it and wring all the self-pity out of it?"
 
I separately interviewed Hainey, Berg, and Brockes last year for author Q&A features in the Monitor. Late last month, I brought them together in person for a panel discussion at the annual conference of the American Society of Journalists & Authors. (As of July, I'll be the president of this non-profit association of independent writers.)
 
The title of the panel was "The Redemptive Power of Story." It turned out that the authors didn't necessarily find redemption, but they did work their way closer to peace, resolution and the truth.
 
Here are some excerpts from the panel discussion.
 
On hiding a deep family secret
 
Attorney David Berg's brother was murdered by a hit man in the 1960s. He felt guilt and regret ever since but found a way to deal with his pain by writing "Run, Brother, Run: A Memoir of a Murder in My Family."
 
Berg: "It's a story I needed to tell.
 
What triggered this for me was 'A River Runs Through It,' a novella that's very close to the murder of author Norman Maclean's brother over a gambling debt.
 
I'd never known anyone who had lost a brother. I went 40 years without talking about my brother's murder or talking about my brother. My children were left in the dark, and some of my friends didn't know I'd ever even had a brother.
 
I felt it was important that my children know not just the single thread of my brother's horrible end, but how our family life began in Arkansas, moving to Texas, and how there was that incredibly complex family dynamic led to Alan's murder.
 
My father had nothing to do with my brother's murder, but he pointed him in a direction in which he could never have missed that bullet."
 
On living in denial
 
Journalist Emma Brockes knew her late mother had endured intense horrors as a child in South Africa. But she didn't know the full story until she did the research that produced "She Left Me the Gun: My Mother's Life Before Me."
 
Brockes: "I'd resisted writing and talking about it for a very long time.
 
The events that constitute the material of my book were never spoken in my family. I had that taboo to deal with and sheepishness about writing this kind of memoir.
 
I'm a big fan of denial, and I think it gets a bad rap. If I could have been able to get away without doing this, I would have.
 
But there were two problems. First, if you know you're in denial, you're not in denial. You're faking it.
 
And secondly, when a parent dies, irrespective of how racy their background has been, your relationship with their history changes. You need to decide whether to take it on or let it vanish into oblivion."
 
On realizing they'd left themselves out of their books
 
Michael Hainey, a journalist at GQ Magazine, never knew why his father died suddenly in 1970. His dogged investigation reveals the truth in "After Visiting Friends: A Son's Story."
 
Hainey: "I was five years into it. I'd written a draft, and I took it to a friend. Three weeks later, I sat down with him, and he said, 'I have to tell you something: I don't see any of you in this book. You came back from all these reporting trips, you told me these amazing stories, but there's nothing of you.'
 
This light went off over my head. I was telling my father's story, and he was in the foreground, but I was in the background. It was both our stories."
 
Berg: "An editor told him that 'You're a storyteller, but this story is about you, too.' What's missing was how I was reacting to this story I'm telling."

On self-pity via memoir
 
Berg: "I didn't write it, honestly, to help others. I'm about the farthest thing from Dr. Phil, being a trial lawyer and a narcissist. I wrote it to give my brother a life, to explain what he was about.
 
I loathe self-pity and think that's at the heart of too many memoirs. What I tried to wring from this book was any semblance of self-pity. One of the reasons I didn't write the book for so long was that I didn't want to invoke 'I'm sorry.'"
 
On finding peace through memoir
 
Berg: "This book did more for me than all the therapy I ever had.
 
I didn't have trouble writing about my mother or father. They were dead. But I was very angry at them.
 
When I was done, I left almost all of that on the page. I've left most of my anger on those pages.
 
When you write memoir, it strips away all the years, all the layers of denial, layers of shame, and leaves you very vulnerable, and in touch with your feelings."
 
Randy Dotinga is a Monitor contributor.

Check out Randy Dotinga's previous interviews with Berg, Brockes, and Hainey.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.