Donna Tartt's 'The Goldfinch' – a novel that has charmed critics and readers alike – wins the 2014 Pulitzer Prize

Other 2014 Pulitzer Prize-winning titles included 'Tom's River' by Dan Fagin (general nonfiction), 'The Internal Enemy' by Alan Taylor (history), and 'Margaret Fuller' by Megan Marshall (biography).

Gino Domenico/AP
Donna Tartt's 771-page novel 'The Goldfinch' – today named the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction winner – has been a bestseller since its publication last fall.

A bestselling favorite about an unlikely art heist took top honors in this year’s Pulitzer Prize for fiction.

Donna Tartt’s “The Goldfinch,” as announced by the Columbia University School of Journalism Monday.

The 771-page novel follows the story of 13-year-old orphan Theo Decker, who steals a valuable painting titled “The Goldfinch,” after the Metropolitan Museum of Art is targeted in a terrorist bomb attack.

Judges described the book as a "beautifully written coming-of-age novel with exquisitely drawn characters that follows a grieving boy’s entanglement with a small famous painting that has eluded destruction, a book that stimulates the mind and touches the heart."

Monitor reviewer Yvonne Zipp calls the book a “hefty delight,” part coming-of-age story, part reckoning, and part thriller “that a certain kind of reader … can happily get lost in.”

The book has enjoyed critical and commercial success. It was nominated for a National Book Critics Circle Award and an Andrew Carnegie Medal and has been a bestseller since it was published.

The Pulitzer in General Nonfiction went to Dan Fagin’s “Toms River: A Story of Science and Salvation,” the story of a small New Jersey town and its residents whose lives were changed by decades of toxic dumping.

“Toms River” is “a book that deftly combines investigative reporting and historical research to probe a New Jersey seashore town’s cluster of childhood cancers linked to water and air pollution,” Pulitzer judges said in their statement.

One of the country’s foremost colonial historians, Alan Taylor’s “The Internal Enemy: Slavery and War in Virginia” took the prize in History, “a meticulous and insightful account of why runaway slaves in the colonial era were drawn to the British side as potential liberators.”

And Megan Marshall’s “Margaret Fuller: A New American Life” claimed the prize for Biography, “a richly researched book that tells the remarkable story of a 19th century author, journalist, critic and pioneering advocate of women’s rights who died in a shipwreck.”

Among the most prestigious prizes in the field, the Pulitzer awards prizes in journalism, books, drama, and music are announced each year by Columbia University’s School of Journalism. Pulitzer Prize winners receive a $10,000 award and a coveted distinction.  

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.