'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' Potter book will be a film trilogy

J.K. Rowling's book 'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them,' a fake textbook set in the 'Harry Potter' world, will reportedly be adapted as a film trilogy.

'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' will be adapted for the screen.

The film adaptation of J.K. Rowling’s “Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them,” originally a fake textbook by Rowling based in Harry Potter’s world, will be a trilogy, according to Warner Bros. CEO Kevin Tsujihara.

Tsujihara told the New York Times that the movie version of Rowling’s story, the screenplay for which is being written by the “Potter” author, would consist of three parts.

“Fantastic” was originally released in 2001 and the film trilogy will focus on the book’s fictional author, Newt Scamander. The story will be set in New York and will take place long before Harry arrives on the scene, with events unspooling 70 years before the “Potter” series.

The New York Times gives Newt’s job title as “magizoologist.” When the film adaptation of “Fantastic” was announced, Warner Bros. said the story would focus on “the adventures of the book’s fictitious author, Newt Scamander.”

A trilogy seems to be the default setting for both literary sci-fi and fantasy series as well as their film adaptations. The tradition, of course, goes all the way back to J.R.R. Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings” series and recent young adult series that were written in trilogies include the “Divergent” series by Veronica Roth and the “Hunger Games” books by Suzanne Collins, though Collins’s last book is being split into two movies.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.