'Gone with the Wind' prequel will focus on the character of Mammy

'Rhett Butler's People' writer Donald McCaig's novel 'Ruth's Journey' will be released this October.

AP
Actress Hattie McDaniel portrayed the character of Mammy in the film version of 'Gone with the Wind.'

Readers will soon be able to view the famous story of “Gone with the Wind” by Margaret Mitchell through the eyes of an unexpected character: Scarlett’s slave Mammy.

The Mitchell estate has authorized writer Donald McCaig to write a novel, titled “Ruth’s Journey” (Ruth is Mammy’s real name in this telling), that details how the character is brought to America as a slave and how she views the events of Mitchell’s original novel. McCaig’s novel “Rhett Butler’s People,” which was released in 2007 and explores the childhood and family history of “Wind” romantic hero Rhett, was one of two books previously authorized by the Mitchell estate, with author Alexandra Ripley’s “Scarlett” also approved.

“Ruth” is set to be published by Simon & Schuster via its imprint Atria Books in October.

“It was Donald’s idea, instead of doing another sequel, to go backwards,” Atria editorial director Peter Borland told the New York Times. “He felt that Mammy was such a fascinating and crucial character to the book. He wanted to flesh out a story of her own.” 

According to Borland, McCaig’s novel doesn’t shy away from the racial themes embedded in the world of “Wind.”

“What’s really remarkable about what Donald has done is that it’s a book that respects and honors its source material, but it also provides a necessary correction to what is one of the more troubling aspects of the book, which is how the black characters are portrayed,” he said.

The actress who portrayed Mammy in the 1939 film version of “Wind,” Hattie McDaniel, became the first African-American to win an Oscar when she was given the Best Supporting Actress prize for her role.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.