'The Beatles Are Here!': Five writers reminisce

Five writers remember the arrival of The Beatles in the US and how it affected – or, in one case, failed to affect – their lives.

Journalist and author Verlyn Klinkenbourg found in the music of The Beatles "a feeling I can’t name or describe, the languor of regret, the urgency of despair."

This month’s 50th anniversary of the first visit of The Beatles to the United States has prompted lots of reflection on how the Fab Four affected American pop music, but the world’s most famous British rock group  touched the world of literature, too.

Or so readers have been reminded by a new anthology, The Beatles Are Here! : 50 Years After the Band Arrived in America, Writers, Musicians and Other Fans Remember (Algonquin, $15.95, 255 pp.).

Edited by Penelope Rowlands, the essay collection includes remembrances from Beatles admirers and fellow musical artists, but “The Beatles Are Here!” also throws light on how the band shaped the thinking of a number of people who would eventually become distinguished journalists and people of letters. Even those who professed not to be Beatles fans, such as Fran Lebowitz, still felt compelled to respond to the British Invasion of pop music in some way.

The Beatles arrived in New York for their first visit to America on Feb. 7, 1964. Here, courtesy of “The Beatles Are Here!,” are five quick takes on the event from various writers. For the full version, be sure and check out Rowlands’ anthology:

1.  “My father would not let me and my three sisters watch The Beatles when they appeared on ‘The Ed Sullivan Show’ in February 1964. His official reason for imposing this interdiction was because the Catholic Church had identified The Beatles as tools of Satan. This was strange because even at that very early juncture, The Beatles, with the possible exception of John, seemed quite harmless and cuddly.”

– Joe Queenan, author and newspaper columnist

2. “After I got The Beatles assignment, I spent the whole day watching them as they moved into public recognition. I watched them from afar.... I didn’t talk to them, I just watched. That’s what I specialized in. I don’t really like to talk to people. I’m a watcher, a scene describer. When I’m writing I’m not a civilian, but a kind of performer – a participating, fantasizing performer. I’m like an actor who plays a role and the role I play has to do with the people I’m writing about.”

– Gay Talese, journalist and author

3. “All I wanted when I had finished hearing them was to hear them again. They contain, each in its own way, a feeling I can’t name or describe, the languor of regret, the urgency of despair. But above all they contain the love of music.”

– Verlyn Klinkenbourg, journalist and author

4. “The day The Beatles landed in New York City was the day the United Kingdom could finally see that it wasn’t just yesterday’s power, on the decline, but part of what would form tomorrow’s transatlantic axis. They were flying into the future, really, – our future – and the next thing we knew, Britain would be branding itself as the new America....”

– Pico Iyer, journalist and author

5. “The arrival of The Beatles didn’t affect me at all.... In the long run, they must have influenced my life in some way because they were such an enormous cultural influence. I mean, I know probably a million Beatles songs because you can’t not know a million Beatles songs. But at the time, they barely registered, although I do remember watching them on ‘Ed Sullivan.’”

– Fran Lebowitz, author

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.