Is 2014 the year of the woman writer?

Advocates for women writers – working to counter what is seen as bias towards males in the literary community – suddenly seem to be everywhere.

|
Evan Agostini/AP
Author Jodi Picoult wrote in 2010 of what she called the New York Times' focus on 'white male literary darlings.'

It’s official: 2014 is the Year of Reading Women.

In other words, if 2013 was the year of recognizing male bias in literature, then 2014 is the year of recognizing great women writers.

That’s the trend sweeping the literary community this year, thanks to the efforts of an array of advocates – from a small literary journal declaring 2014 the year of the woman writer to a handful of authors who have created clever Twitter campaigns and adopted women-only reading resolutions – who are championing reading, reviewing, and promoting female writers.

It’s a move, and perhaps a new cultural movement, designed to counter the gaping gender gap recently revealed in the literary community.

For the past three years, Vida, an organization for women in the literary arts, has been conducting a count of how many books reviewed by prominent publications were written by women and the results have been dispiriting. 

At Harper's, in 2012, 90 percent of the book reviewers were male and the publication reviewed five times as many books by male authors as by female authors.

At the New Republic, in 2012, roughly 90 percent of book reviewers were also male and the publication also reviewed five times as many books by male authors as by female.

And at the New York Review of Books, in 2012, roughly 18 percent of reviewers were women and 22 percent of books reviewed were written by women, according to Vida’s study.

Though there were bright spots – The New York Times, Poetry Magazine, and Granta did better – overall, most publications showed a significant gender bias toward male reviewers and reviews for books written by male authors. 

And according to a 2011 study, that bias even extends to children’s books.

Perhaps that’s why, in 2010, author Jodi Piccoult attacked the New York Times for its focus on “white male literary darlings.” 

“Women writers and writers of color are underserved and undervalued by the contemporary literary community,” Daniel Pritchard, editor of literary journal the Critical Flame, wrote in a blog post. “What we can see today are the outlines of a culture still dominated by white male figures, and by the presumption of their essential literary merit, everywhere from major publishing houses to small literary journals. As far as mainstream literary culture is concerned, white males are the default.”

As a result, Pritchard has announced that he is dedicating one year wholly to reviewing women writers and writers of color in the Critical Flame.

He told the Guardian he hopes Vida’s study and the Critical Flame’s resolution heralds “a much larger shift in our society.”

Author and artist Joanna Walsh started a Twitter hashtag #readwomen2014, created New Years cards showing some of her favorite female writers, and began a Twitter sensation when she started tweeting 250-odd names of female writers, including Jane Austen, Angela Carter, and Zadie Smith

“Perhaps the problem lies not with whether women are published, but how,” she writes for the Guardian. “Lionel Shriver complained when her 'nasty book' Game Control was given a 'girly cover', and I've listened to female writer friends grouse when their books are given flowery covers though their writing is not; when reviews, or even their publishers' press releases, describe their work as 'delicate' when it is forthright, 'delightful' when it is satirical, 'carving a niche' when it is staking a claim.”

Walsh follows the lead of two – male – authors who embarked on women-only reading resolutions.

Author and literary critic Matthew Jakubowski has announced a reading resolution to read and review only books by women in 2014 and Jonathan Gibbs, an author and journalist, undertook his own female-only reading experiment last year to challenge his own assumptions.

It’s a bold way to ring in a new year and perhaps a new chapter for women writers and the wholesale effect may be that a new cultural movement will sweep the literary community, finally giving due attention to the great women writers of the past and present.

Husna Haq is a Monitor correspondent.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Is 2014 the year of the woman writer?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/chapter-and-verse/2014/0122/Is-2014-the-year-of-the-woman-writer
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe