Professor discovers previously unpublished Mary Shelley letters

In the letters, 'Frankenstein' author Mary Shelley discusses her son, among other subjects.

Gutenberg.org
Mary Shelley's letters were written to stockbroker Horace Smith and his daughter Eliza.

A professor recently unearthed previously unseen letters written by “Frankenstein” author Mary Shelley.

Nora Crook, a professor at the UK’s Anglia Ruskin University, was conducting research on another topic when she stumbled on the website for the Essex Record Office. Documents stored there were each labeled “Letter from Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley.”

“I knew right away they had never been published before,” Crook said of seeing the letters in an interview with the Guardian.

The 13 documents are the biggest group of never-before-released letters from Shelley to be found in decades and include seals from Shelley, which were not found on any previous letters written by her.

Shelley, best remembered for her famous 1818 novel “Frankenstein,” is also the author of such works as “The Last Man,” “Mathilda,” and “Faulkner.” She was married to the poet Percy Bysshe Shelley.

The newly found letters were written between 1831 and 1849, after the death of Percy. In her letters, all of which were written to stockbroker Horace Smith and his daughter Eliza, Shelley speaks of raising her son, also named Percy.

“Percy is growing up a very fine young man & developing tastes & talents that would remind you of his father," Shelley writes. Of his time at Cambridge, she wrote, “He is getting all that we could wish – he is getting very liberal – & has so much character & talent – though still shy – that I have every hope for his future happiness,” though she adds, “I am mortified he is not taller.”

Shelley died of what was diagnosed as a brain tumor in 1851, and in some of the letters, she mentions feeling ill.

Crook noted that the letters are a window into Shelley's relationships with others, including her “charming, wheedling side” when she asked Smith for favors.

“What is nice is that Mary Shelley's personality emerges,” she told the Guardian. “We see her as very loyal to the Smith family, very grateful and very attentive to Eliza – I don't think that friendship has ever been fully documented.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.