'Allegiant' ending inspires some angry fan reaction

'Allegiant,' the third book in the 'Divergent' trilogy by Veronica Roth, pleased some fans but has outraged others.

'Allegiant' is the third book in the 'Divergent' series by Veronica Roth.

Industry watchers were already guessing that sales of “Allegiant,” the third and final installment of Veronica Roth’s dystopian trilogy, would be big.

And it turns out that “Allegiant” gave its publisher, HarperCollins, its biggest first-day sales numbers ever, selling 455,000 copies in all formats all over the world, according to Publishers Weekly.

The novel had impressive pre-sales numbers and anticipation was running high before the book’s release, with some stores planning midnight celebrations.

But now that the book’s been out for a few days, some of its readers are expressing intense displeasure with the way that the story wraps up. You’ll get no spoilers from us, but apparently the ending is rather controversial. 

Some fans took to Twitter to express their happiness or displeasure with the book. There were those, like Laura Burris, who seemed quite satisfied with the finale.

“#Allegiant. Completed. Heartbroken. Numb. Amazed. @VeronicaRoth is a goddess,” she wrote.

But for others it was a different story. Twitter user Jirah Catungal tweeting, “I want to cry [because] of Allegiant but I feel numb,” while Izzy Lightwood tweeted that "THE PAIN OF ALLEGIANT FEELS LIKE AN OPEN WOUND SPRINKLED WITH SALT OIL AND ALCOHOL."

In fact, so many angry readers vented their feelings into cyberspace that the site Flavorwire wrote an article titled “Reader Reactions to ‘Allegiant’ Are an Online Fandom Horror Story” (spoilers are included) which examines the book’s negative Amazon reviews.

Apparently some fans decided not to read the book based on what they heard. Hypable writer Marama Whyte pleaded with them to think again in a piece titled “Don’t be put off by ‘Allegiant’ spoilers: Why you should still read the book.” 

“It isn’t fair to reduce the entire story of Allegiant to one single event, whatever that event may be,” Whyte wrote. “That is the problem with Allegiant spoilers. They are given as a snippet of information, without context or explanation…. Other people seem to be forgetting that, as an author, Roth doesn’t owe it to them to wrap up her story the way that they would wish. After all, this is her story, and her series. Really, we’re just lucky that she decided to share it with us in the first place.”

Roth answered the fan response via Twitter. 

“Here is all I'm going to say: strong reader reactions, whether negative or positive, are completely fine with me,” she tweeted, following that with “Physical threats are NOT fine with me, but we all know that already” and “I will talk about Allegiant more when the tour is done. For now, read, react, talk.” 

According to the website BiblioFiend, as referenced in Roth’s tweet, some angry fans have threatening the author with violence.

“It is incredibly unfortunate that people would resort to such claims against someone who has shared such a beautiful thing with the world,” the website wrote.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.