Narnia book 'The Silver Chair' will be next for a movie adaptation

C.S. Lewis's 'The Silver Chair' will be the fourth Narnia book recently adapted for the big screen.

Phil Bray/Walt Disney Pictures/AP
'The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe' stars Tilda Swinton (l.) and Skander Keynes (r.).

A movie based on the Chronicles of Narnia book “The Silver Chair” by C.S. Lewis is being created.

The current series of movies began with the 2005 release of “The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe,” then “Prince Caspian” followed in 2008. The most recent, “The Voyage of the Dawn Treader,” appeared in 2010.

Mark Gordon of The Mark Gordon Company will produce the movie along with the C.S. Lewis Company.

“Like many readers, both young and old, I am a huge fan of C.S. Lewis’s beautiful and allegorical world of Narnia,” Gordon said in a statement. “These fantasy stories inspire real-world passion among millions of devoted fans around the world. As we prepare to bring the next book to life, we are humbled and excited to contribute to the outstanding legacy of Narnia.”

“Silver” does not include any of the Pevensie children, who were the heroes of “Lion” and “Caspian.” Only the two younger siblings, Edmund and Lucy, appeared in “Dawn,” and “Silver” centers on the children’s cousin Eustace and his schoolmate Jill.

Walden Media was behind the first three film adaptations, but the deal between Walden and the Lewis estate expired in 2011 before a fourth movie was made. However, Walden Media told Entertainment Weekly before the deal came to an end that the next book Walden would have chosen to adapt would have been “The Magician’s Nephew,” a book which, chronologically, takes place before “Lion.”

Some fans – including including Guardian writer Ben Child – feel the Lewis estate should have stuck with that plan.

“Executives had the chance to take everything right back to the start and shoot the rather wonderful The Magician's Nephew,” he wrote. “The Silver Chair rivals only the confusingly biblical (at least, for me as a young reader) The Last Battle for twee tedium. The Magician's Nephew is a lot more fun.”

Child admired the work done by actress Tilda Swinton as the wicked White Witch in the first movie and noted that, as “Magician” is a prequel, Swinton could have returned for a movie adaptation of that book.

“Both 2008's Prince Caspian and 2010's The Voyage of the Dawn Treader suffered from a distinct Swinton deficit,” he wrote. “The apparently ageless Swinton, should the film-makers have been able to recruit her, would have had plenty to chew on [in ‘Magician’].”

Other fans agree with Child's pitch.

“Why… would you film The Silver Chair before The Magician's Nephew?” Twitter user Nina Martinez wrote.

Some, however, disagree. 

“Silver Chair was the best one anyway!” Twitter user Sean Miller tweeted upon the announcement of the next movie adaptation.

No release date has yet been announced for the new movie.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.