Kelly Clarkson, museum vie for Jane Austen ring

Kelly Clarkson bought a ring owned by Jane Austen at an auction. But British Austen-lovers are doing their best to keep this treasure on their side of the Atlantic. 

This gold-and-topaz ring is one of only three pieces of jewelry belonging to Jane Austen known to still exist.

Kelly Clarkson, the very first winner of American Idol, bought a ring previously owned by Jane Austen at an auction. She paid about $235,700, according to press reports. But there is a very real possibility that Clarkson – a bona fide Austen fan who owns a first edition of "Persuasion" – will never take actual possession of her new treasure. British Minister of Culture, Ed Vaizey, has delayed its export.

Louise West, curator of The Austen House Museum in Chawton, told the Independent that Jane Austen artifacts are rare and many British Austen-lovers feel that it would be a shame for the gold-and-topaz item to leave the country. One of only three pieces of Austen's jewelry known to exist, the ring passed from Austen to her sister Cassandra, who later gave it to a future sister-in-law. The ring had remained in the Austen family till the sale to Clarkson.

The Guardian says that The Austen House Museum had talked to the owners of the ring before the auction took place but that their 30,000 euro bid wasn’t enough to win the prize.   

So West began a fundraising drive, hoping to keep the ring in the UK. Thanks to a recently received anonymous $155,000 (100,000 euros) donation, the museum is now much closer to being able to meet the price paid by Clarkson. According to the Independent, Clarkson has said that she is willing to sell the ring to a British buyer if that buyer can offer an amount equal to what she paid. 

The Austen House Museum has expressed much enthusiasm at the idea of adding Austen's ring to their collection. The Independent reports that they already have a turquoise bracelet and a topaz cross that belonged to the writer. The addition of the ring would be in time to celebrate the bicentennial celebration of the publication of “Mansfield Park” that is to take place next year.

At the same time, West is also happy to admit that recent publicity generated by the ring is all to the good. "We were very excited that someone like Kelly Clarkson was a fan of Jane Austen," she told the press. "It's not what you'd expect from a young, cool U.S. pop singer. It says a lot about Austen's popularity and who she's popular with. It's not just middle-aged women."

Surrendering the item might not be all bad for Clarkson, either. She is reported to have a replica of the ring that fiancé Brandon Blackstock gave her, in addition to an open invitation from the museum to visit the real thing any time that she likes. 

And who knows – maybe there's a really cool song somewhere in all this, too.

Casey Lee is a Monitor contributor.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.