Jane Austen will be the face of the 10-pound note in the UK

New governor Mark Carney recently confirmed that Austen would appear on the 10-pound note, most likely beginning in 2017.

Bank of England/AP
Jane Austen will appear on the UK's 10-pound note, replacing Charles Darwin.

It’s official – Jane Austen will appear on England’s ten-pound note.

The possibility was originally brought up by departing governor of the Bank of England Sir Mervyn King, who mentioned that Austen was just “waiting in the wings” to take her place on currency. Mark Carney, the new governor, recently confirmed that Austen would appear on the ten-pound note.

“Jane Austen certainly merits a place in the select group of historical figures to appear on our banknotes Carney said in a statement. “Her novels have an enduring and universal appeal and she is recognized as one of the greatest writers in English literature.”

Controversy had erupted after it was announced that Elizabeth Fry, who worked for reform in the country’s prisons, was being taken off the five-pound note in favor of Winston Churchill. A historical figure being cycled out is nothing unusual – famous people usually appear on British currency for 10 to 20 years – but Fry is the only woman currently appearing on the country’s money other than the queen. Florence Nightingale had been featured in the past, but was the only other woman ever to have been so honored.

Caroline Criado-Perez, a crusader for feminist issues, had said she was considering suing the bank for not upholding the country’s Equality Act and she started a petition on Change.org asking that a woman be represented on the country’s bills which was signed by more than 35,000 people.

Carney said Austen would most likely appear for the first time in 2017 and added that the process by which historical figures are chosen for money would be reviewed.

“We want people to have confidence in our commitment to diversity,” he said in a statement.

Criado-Perez told the Guardian she was very happy to hear the news.

“Without this campaign, without the 35,000 people who signed our Change.org petition, the Bank of England would have unthinkingly airbrushed women out of history,” she said. “We warmly welcome this move from the Bank and thank them for listening to us and taking such positive and emphatic steps to address our concerns. To hear Jane Austen confirmed is fantastic, but to hear the process will be comprehensively reviewed is even better.” 

The picture of Austen that will appear on the bill is a sketch of the writer done by her sister Cassandra. However, the quote from Austen’s works that will appear on the bill, “I declare after all there is no enjoyment like reading!,” has drawn objections from some. The quote is uttered by Miss Caroline Bingley, eventual sister-in-law to heroine Elizabeth Bennet’s sister Jane and someone with whom Elizabeth was not on good terms. Guardian writer John Mullan called it a “major blunder.”

“Has the Bank of England governor actually read Pride and Prejudice?” he asked. “These words are spoken by one of Austen's most deceitful characters, a woman who has no interest in books at all.”

Meanwhile, Washington Post writer Manuel Roig-Franzia said the UK’s new diverse money highlighted the lack of women on US banknotes.

“No women,” he wrote of the bills that are most commonly used. “No minorities. All white guys. (Yes, there is a Susan B. Anthony coin. But when’s the last time you used one of those?)”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.