Twitter's answer to poetry: @Pentametron

Twitter user Ranjit Bhatnagar has created an algorithm that finds the poetry in seemingly disparate tweets.

Ann Hermes
Pentametron finds tweets that happen to be in iambic pentameter (the same meter used by Shakespeare) and matches them to other tweets in the same meter that rhyme.

@Pentametron is a very unusual Twitter account. Its Twitter page touts its unique purpose: "With algorithms subtle and discrete / I seek iambic writings to retweet."

In an interview with NPR Ranjit Bhatnagar, the creator of Pentametron, explains how it works: "I'd been interested in playing around with the idea of poetry; I was kind of inspired by the exquisite corpse games of the surrealists," he says.

But Bhatnagar is also a self-described "big nerd." So after studying Twitter's API ("the systems that let programmers talk to Twitter"), he realized that there was a way to subscribe to Twitter that would allow him to "receive just an endless waterfall of tweets from them."

Such a prospect might not excite the average person but Bhatnagar, as a poetry-loving techno-type, saw some interesting possibilities in that waterfall. "And what I ended up doing was combining my interest in surrealist poetry and Twitter's API and Pentametron came out of that."

Pentametron finds tweets that happen to be in iambic pentameter (the same meter used by poet William Shakespeare) and matches them to other tweets in the same meter that rhyme. An example: 

good music never makes the radio

I really want a chicken salad tho !

Each sentence is from a different user. Sometimes they are disparate and surreal, other times they kind of work together, like this couplet:

The only journey is the one within.

That's when the flashbacks started to begin.

The program produces about 20 couplets a day and currently has more than 7,000 followers. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.