'Cat in the Hat' goes to the movies – again

Following on the success of "The Lorax," a new movie version of "The Cat in the Hat" – this time animated – is now being planned.

R: Melinda Sue Gordon/Universal Studios/Dreamworks
The 2003 movie version of 'The Cat in the Hat' starring Mike Myers was a box office and critical misfire.

Another beloved Seuss book will get the big-screen treatment. A new adaptation of “The Cat in the Hat” is being planned, but this one will be animated.

Following on the box-office and critical success of “The Lorax,” the film’s producer Christopher Meledandri and Dr. Seuss's widow Audrey Geisel will be working with Universal Pictures on a CG-animated 3-D adaptation of the beloved story of the wild and wonderful cat who comes by to play when Mother is out. “Lorax” was produced by Universal and Illumination Entertainment, the company for which Meledandri is the founder and CEO.

The news of the “Cat” adaptation surprised some because the Seuss classic has already been made into a movie. The 2003 adaptation starring Mike Myers had more adult humor than many expected and received negative reviews. The film did not make as much money as had been anticipated. Geisel disliked the movie and made a statement after it was released that future Seuss adaptations would only be animated.

Rob Lieber, who co-wrote the 2006 movie adaptation of the children’s book “Hoot,” is set to write the screenplay for “Cat.” Lieber is also penning the script for the movie adaptation of “Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day.”

Molly Driscoll is a Monitor contributor.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.