E-book readers are buying plenty – but not in bookstores

The new study by Book Industry Study Group says e-book consumers are buying more books – both print and electronic – but they’re buying mostly online and via in-app purchasing.

Fiction readers are gravitating toward Kindles and Nooks, while nonfiction readers tend to prefer tablet readers like iPads.

We’ve known it all along: E-book readers are buying and reading more, according to a study by the Book Industry Study Group.

What’s interesting, though, is where they’re buying and what they’re reading. According to the BISG’s Consumer Attitudes Toward E-book Reading survey, e-book consumers are buying more books – both print and electronic – but they’re buying mostly online and via in-app purchasing. Where they’re not buying, according to the survey, is brick-and-mortar stores. More than half of e-book readers increased their use of apps to purchase books and more than one-third increased their use of general retail websites such as Amazon.com, according to a BISG statement. Sadly, that seems to come at the expense of chain and indie bookstores. According to the survey, more than a third of e-book buyers decreased their spending at national chains and 29 percent reported buying less from their local indie.

"The e-book market is developing very quickly, with consumer attitudes and behavior changing over the course of months, rather than years,” said Angela Bole, BISG's Deputy Executive Director, in a statement. “One of the strengths of this study is its ability to monitor 'Power Buyers.' They are predictors of where the market is moving, providing us with an ideal opportunity to look at what's coming next.”

Since e-readers are still a relatively new force in the publishing industry, understanding the trends surrounding e-reading – which devices readers prefer, how they’re purchasing and how much, what they’re reading – helps publishers, marketers, and retailers understand the new market and its potential.

Another trend: While dedicated e-readers remain the dominant e-reading platform, multi-function tablet devices like Apple’s iPad, and smartphones are gaining in popularity. (Almost 17 percent of respondents said they used tablets to read e-books, up 13 percent from a previous survey.)

Perhaps, most interesting, however, is just what e-reader readers are reading. An O’Reilly Radar reporter posed that question to BISG deputy executive director Boyle. “It depends,” said Boyle, “to a degree on whether you’re a ‘tablet person’ or a ‘dedicated e-reader person.’” Readers of fiction, she went on, seem to prefer Kindle and Nook devices, while nonfiction readers like using tablet readers like the iPad.

“In these reports, the data have suggested that dedicated e-readers may be better optimized for narrative reading, while the richer media capabilities of tablets may be more appropriate for nonfiction, education, and scientific and professional titles,” said Boyle. “The greatest interest today seems to lie in narrative fiction and nonfiction, with interest in more interactive nonfiction and education taking longer to develop.”

For more interesting developments in the e-book industry, see the BISG’s survey here.

Husna Haq is a Monitor correspondent.

Join the Monitor's book discussion on Facebook and Twitter.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.