Author of a Sarah Palin tell-all is fined for publishing e-mails deemed confidential

Frank Bailey, author of 'Blind Allegiance to Sarah Palin,' paid his $11,900 fine after an activist protested his ability to publish the e-mails.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
One of the e-mails published in Bailey's book about his time working for former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin concerned a candidate for the position of state attorney general.

A former aide to Sarah Palin, who wrote an unflattering tell-all about working for her while she was governor of Alaska, has paid the fine he was charged for including in his book e-mails considered to be confidential.

According to the Alaska Department of Law, Frank Bailey, whose book was titled “Blind Allegiance to Sarah Palin,” broke Alaska’s ethics laws by profiting from the use of confidential state e-mails, one of which concerned a candidate for state attorney general.

Bailey, who worked as the director of Boards and Commissions for Palin’s administration, had showed a manuscript of his book to the Attorney General’s office before it was published. When the AG's office indicated that some of the material that he was including would be considered confidential, he took some – but not all – of the material in question out of the manuscript.

Bailey was charged with the $11,900 fine after Andree McLeod, an activist who had been seeking the e-mails Palin sent from her personal e-mail to a state account. McLeod has told the press that every e-mail in Bailey’s book should be released to the public.

McLeod first complained in 2010 and wrote that she and various media outlets had all tried to get access to the e-mails, without success.

“Yet, it seems that a former Palin aide and two others who remain anonymous have free access to Palin's emails ... all because Bailey worked for her in the governor's office,” she wrote in her official complaint.

In the text of Bailey’s settlement with the state of Alaska, he states that some of the e-mails he used in the book were in fact confidential.

Molly Driscoll is a Monitor contributor.

Join the Monitor's book discussion on Facebook and Twitter.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.