Why Barnes & Noble is considering separating the Nook from its business

Barnes & Noble says it had record sales on its Nook device but that the Nook Simple Touch sales numbers were less than projected.

Barnes & Noble's Nook Tablet device sales "exceeded expectations," according to a press release, though the Nook Simple Touch numbers weren't as high as expected.

Barnes & Noble surprised the public when the bookseller announced today that it was considering separating the Nook from its business.

“We see substantial value in what we’ve built with our Nook business in only two years, and we believe it’s the right time to investigate our options to unlock that value,” William Lynch, chief executive officer of Barnes & Noble, said in a press release.

Shares in the company went down more than 20 percent after the announcement. Some investors seem to fear that without the Nook device, which has sold well so far, Barnes & Noble would be less financially successful.

The press release from the company said that sales for its Nook Tablet device exceeded estimates. However, according to the press release, the Nook Simple Touch device did not sell as well as hoped.

It was because of the lower-than-expected Nook Simple Touch sales and the cost of promoting the Nook devices, said the press release, that Barnes & Noble would be decreasing the Nook sales forecast for the year from $1.8 billion to $1.5 billion.

Morningstar analyst Pete Wahlstrom told Reuters that the disappointing sales of the Nook Simple Touch are a sign that Barnes & Noble may be struggling against Amazon.

“They're going to have to raise capital for Nook if they want to stay viable," he said.

Lynch told Dow Jones that saying the Nook can't go up against Amazon's Kindle device or the iPad is a "rather ridiculous and simplistic way" to look at the competition.

According to the press release, Barnes & Noble does not have a timeline for the review of the possible decision to separate the Nook business from the company.

Molly Driscoll is a Monitor contributor.

Join the Monitor's book discussion on Facebook and Twitter.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.