Tom Stoppard’s friends have nothing but good things to say about him

With full access, Hermione Lee has written the most authorized of authorized biographies of the British-Czech playwright and member of the literati. 

|
Penguin Random House
“Tom Stoppard: A Life” by Hermione Lee, Knopf, 896 pp.

Beloved playwright Tom Stoppard, winner of countless accolades – including an Academy Award and a shelf of Tony Awards – first asked the great biographer Hermione Lee to write his life story in 2013, and that book, “Tom Stoppard: A Life,” has finally appeared. The book dresses out at almost 900 pages. This will be a cause for celebration among the many fans Lee has garnered with her other biographies; she’s previously focused on Willa Cather, Virginia Woolf, Penelope Fitzgerald, and, most magnificently, Edith Wharton. A big new book from Lee is always a happy event for readers of biography.

Stoppard, too, has armies of fans. Born as Tomáš Sträussler in Czechoslovakia in 1937 and raised in England by his mother Marta (née Becková) and his English stepfather Kenneth Stoppard, he began his writing career as a columnist and theater critic. It wasn’t too long before he turned to playwriting himself, achieving enormous national success beginning in 1967 for his play “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead,” which was immediately embraced by critics and theatergoers alike.

An unbroken string of successes stretched out from that auspicious event. Stoppard went on to write engaging stage works like “Arcadia” and “The Coast of Utopia.” He worked as a translator of other writers, including his friend Václav Havel. He co-wrote the screenplay for the hugely popular movie “Shakespeare in Love.” He was ubiquitous at gala events. He received the full battery of honors – president of the London Library, honorary fellow of the British Academy, patron of charities, the beaming face of the public Man of Letters. He has the stately home, the long vacations abroad, and the status of a literary institution; his plays are anthologized and taught in schools; his name is used as an adjective for describing delightfully playful and hyper-intellectual writing.

Along the way, he’s amassed a sizable archive, the primary sources of his own life and times. And although many old friends like Harold Pinter or Havel have died, a legion of friends still remains, and almost all of them share the same general feeling about Stoppard: that he’s a genuinely important figure in English literature, that he matters.

Lee gained access to all of this – the archive, the old friends, all the behind-the-scenes details – when she agreed to become Stoppard’s biographer. This is about as authorized as an authorized biography can be.

Stoppard tells Lee that he imagines his biography as something that exists parallel to his lived experience: “He would be living his life, and I would be writing about his life, and occasionally the lines would intersect,” he says. And, Lee tells her readers, “That’s exactly how it has been.”

“While I’ve been working in his archives, talking to people who know him and writing this book,” she adds, “he’s been getting on with being Tom Stoppard.”

Throughout the book, Lee perceptively discusses Stoppard’s work – her analyses of his major plays are some of the most invigorating examinations they’ve ever received – but it becomes increasingly clear that writing those plays has, for decades, been only a relatively small part of “getting on with being Tom Stoppard.” As so often happens in authorized biographies, readers are regularly subjected to appointment calendars in place of historical narrative. There’s a ceremony at Windsor for the Queen Mother, a trip to New York for Christopher Hitchens’ memorial, an awards presentation, hosting Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, at a dinner, attending Jade Jagger’s wedding, helping Prince Michael of Kent celebrate his birthday....

The word for all this is glamour, and the danger of it co-opting the narrative is the main reason why so many biographers prefer to write about subjects who are no longer living.

Stoppard’s acquaintances, seemingly without exception, tell Lee he’s a marvelous, significant figure. In a chance run-in at a theater, the actress Sinéad Cusack discusses Stoppard’s third wife, the producer Sabrina Guinness, with Stoppard’s old director friend John Boorman. “You know, Sabrina has always been looking for a good man; and now she’s got the best man in the world,” she tells him – and the comment somehow makes its way to Lee.

There’s virtually nothing in “Tom Stoppard: A Life” that reflects even poorly, let alone damningly, on its subject. Is that because Stoppard has no flaws? Or is it because Lee would rather not speak ill of her friends, several of whom she thanks in the book’s acknowledgements, including Stoppard’s third wife and his lawyer? Time will certainly tell.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Tom Stoppard’s friends have nothing but good things to say about him
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/Book-Reviews/2021/0308/Tom-Stoppard-s-friends-have-nothing-but-good-things-to-say-about-him
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe