'Rome' tells the story of the Eternal City through seven moments of defeat

Like most very old and very storied cities, Rome has as many scars as trophies.

Rome: A History in Seven Sackings By Matthew Kneale Simon & Schuster 432 pp.

“Romans, let these be your arts,” the hero Aeneas is sternly told in the underworld by the shade of his father, “to teach the ways of peace to those you conquer; to spare the meek, and to war down the proud.”

It was an anthem fit for the Pax Romana of the surging new Rome being built by Caesar Augustus, the theme of a national epic crafted out of pride and valor. But it had a blind spot as wide as the Tiber: It was made for victors, written to please the city's sole master. This was a fantasy even in Virgil's day – in Virgil's own memory, Rome had been ransacked three times. And many times in the future of the "Aeneid" the city would be the conquered rather than the conqueror; like most very old and very storied cities, Rome has as many scars as trophies.

This hard reality is the guiding genius of Matthew Kneale's absorbing new book Rome: A History in Seven Sackings, which tells the story of the Eternal City through a series of chapters on its darkest hours, from despoiling at the hands of the Goths to the twists of its fate during the Nazi years. Kneale briefly sketches the glorious height of the city's power and wealth, when it had a million inhabitants, bustling squares, markets, law courts, and entertainment arenas, and then he proceeds to follow it through a long procession of conquests and pillages, reaching a weird low point fairly early in the story when Totila and his Ostrogoths conquer Rome in the 6th century – and command that all its citizens simply leave. “For the first time in its existence,” writes Kneale, “Rome, which a century and a half earlier had been the largest and greatest city on earth … was empty.”

Such evocative visual moments occur regularly throughout the book, a testament to the fact that Kneale is also an award-winning novelist (author of "English Passengers," among other books). For instance, when he writes about the far-fallen Rome encountered by the invading troops of King Henry IV in 1081, he refers to the place as “a kind of "'Gulliver's Travels' town”: “Many Romans lived actually inside the ruins, which they called cryptae, making their homes in the broken remains of thousand-year-old apartment blocks, in long dry baths, and in the storerooms and corridors of abandoned theatres and stadiums. The Colosseum was now the city's largest housing complex.” 

Kneale follows the story of the Eternal City through some of the worst periods in its history – “Rome in 1527 stank as it had not done since the glory days of Empire,” readers are told, “of rubbish, offal, and fish bones, of filthy water from tanneries and dyers, and of dung, both animal and human.” Some would-be conquerors encountered a city already in ruins, others broke in upon a working system of government, and others, in Kneale's account, seem almost bewildered by their role in occupying Rome. When French troops marched into the city in 1849 to put down Garibaldi's populist uprising (covered very readably in David Kertzer's "The Pope Who Would Be King"), for example, they quickly focused more on political than military measures. “Of the seven attacks described in this book,” Kneale writes, “without doubt this one was least like a sacking.” 

Its rival in that regard would be the final sacking Kneale recounts, the invasion of Rome by the Nazis in the autumn of 1943. The lead-up to that occupation was tense and chaotic, as Kneale portrays vividly in his book's strongest chapter. By the morning of September 10th, the Germans were advancing on the center of Rome, facing haphazard and often chaotic resistance along the way: “Confusion reigned. Streets were deserted, doors and shutters were closed, and buses and trams stood abandoned in mid-journey.Civilians seized weapons, some of which they found in the streets left by deserting soldiers.” But once the Nazis were in place, the resulting ordeal for ordinary Romans was “fairly mild” compared to some of the wholesale horrors conveyed elsewhere in Kneale's book.

The Rome of 2018 is a thriving, bustling home to 3 million people (and an additional 4 million tourists every year), a beguiling place of color, contrast, and visible history around every corner; as awestruck visitors have pointed out for centuries, it's still easily possible for walkers obsessed with their cellphones to cross bridges that were crossed by Julius Caesar. That long, uneven, colorful history feels new when it's examined this way, through its defeats instead of its victories.





You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Rome' tells the story of the Eternal City through seven moments of defeat
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today