'Balancing Acts' author Nicholas Hytner looks back at a successful career at London’s National Theatre

Between the color commentary and all the humorous cameos, this book  is a master class in the anatomy of artistic directing.

Balancing Acts By Nicholas Hytner Knopf Doubleday 320 pp.

You would be forgiven to think that a memoir of a dozen terrifically successful years as director of London’s National Theatre would start with a flick of the scarf and away we go. But our protagonist, Nicholas Hytner, is much too cool a cat for that. Vanity is not the way he rolls and he keeps his ego in the shadow. This from a man who, it is no exaggeration, revolutionized the role of artistic director and turned the financial fortunes of the National Theatre neatly around to deep black.

Nor is gossip his thing – not entirely absent from Balancing Actsbut only a couple of the dabs in this pointillist portrait, a finely grained, multifaceted revelation of what it means to be an accomplished artistic director walking that balancing act between high- and low-brow (and entertaining the audience in the process), the insolent with the inclusive, the cackle with the visceral.

Happily, Hytner is no boor either, even without these obvious avenues of approach. He drops names like a flurry of Sugar Ray Leonard punches, but that’s because there are a lot of personalities to mention in 12 years of running three theaters, each theater of different size and emotional personality, and each human personality often accompanied by a crack little vignette or a quote worth remembering. More than once, though none too often, he helps a star down a step or two from vainglory, or pokes some fun at an actor’s foibles.

Between the color commentary and all the humorous cameos – and much the meat of the story – is a master class in the anatomy of artistic directing. Here, too, Hytner is inclusive; a bricklayer, mathematician, or soccer player will become as engrossed by this material as a seasoned director, playwright, or theatergoer. Hytner brought the multiclass attraction to theater by slashing ticket prices in half; better a full theater than a half-full theater for the same receipts. Plus, in the two smaller theaters, he could experiment with prices that were lower than a fast-food dinner as well as experiment with theatrical pieces.

Just some of the things you will read here – occasionally sounding obvious, even trite, but think of how many times you have failed to employ them in your particular situation – are: plays work best when the actor can remember the playwright’s lines; if you only care about what works, meretriciousness lurks; be ambitious and challenging, but sell tickets; rude, disruptive energy makes for a carnival; look into the abyss; make Shakespeare your 400-year-old contemporary; show some abandon, disclose a jagged edge, “tread a tightrope between all your conflicting impulses, to find poise and balance." Sounds like a master class in life.

Theater is critical for society “because a vibrant society thrives on self-examination ... actively engaged in wondering what’s beautiful and what’s truthful.”

Hytner tends to stay away from the self-revealing (except for his run-in with Harold Pinter, which is so invective-strewn it can’t be reproduced here without making the paragraph look like a night sky of asterisks). No, Hytner would rather talk about Shakespeare (and many, many, many another, especially Alan Bennett): how he “interweaves high politics with the concerns of the people,” layers the medieval past on the Elizabethan present, how “ethical absolutes collapse under the weight of lived experience,” how his plays “marginalise women more even than they have been marginalised by history,” or, in "Othello," the staging “invites us not to observe a disordered alien, but to imagine what it would be like to be Iago, so consumed by hatred and envy that he allows them to run out of control.”

Hytner touches down on his pre-National Theatre days, directing (by the seat of his pants) "The Madness of King George" for the big screen and directing the 10-year-running "Miss Saigon" for the big stage: New York’s Broadway. But this is the National Theatre’s day. Hytner mentions all those people with a hand in his productions – and you can imagine most of them, Jonson to Stoppard and a stagehand or two; Shakespeare, too, for this is London’s National Theatre, after all – because without them, the show would not have gone on. Hytner does this all with a brightness that makes you want to hug him.

Next: a new theatrical venue with his old planning-director partner Nick Starr, Bridge Theatre. Prediction: a hit (after hit). Reason: Hytner knows every trick in the book, plus hundreds of his own up his sleeves. Both his head and heart are in the right place. And it couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Balancing Acts' author Nicholas Hytner looks back at a successful career at London’s National Theatre
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today