'William Eggleston Portraits' is a body of work that keeps you guessing

The images of photographer William Eggleston tease with half-told stories.

William Eggleston Portraits By Phillip Prodger Yale University Press 184 pp.

The surreal images of American photographer William Eggleston are likely to leave viewers unsatisfied, and that is a high compliment. Working mostly in the South in the 1960s and ’70s, Eggleston captured images that often seem like movie stills from a film you’ve never seen. Eggleston's compositions of mundane objects and faces will leave you trying to piece together a story that will never be fully clear. For the information they include and the lack thereof, the images in William Eggleston Portraits beg to be scrutinized and revisited.

Even the title and premise of the book is a little unsatisfying. Viewers are primed to look at a collection of portraits that reveal something of the subject or photographer. But traditional poses and compositions are thrown out; subjects are caught in the middle of an incomplete action against a backdrop that leaves few clues. Though it’s difficult to gain any real insights into either the subject or photographer, these “portraits” are intimate and unguarded.

In one of the more memorable images in the book, two young women in colorful dresses recline with a sense of familiarity. A bright, fresh flower set in a glass juxtaposes the drab floral pattern on the couch. The young woman on the right leans toward the one on the left, to console? To whisper a secret?

There’s no conclusion to be reached, but Eggleston’s photographs keep you looking and guessing.
Ann Hermes is a Monitor staff photographer.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'William Eggleston Portraits' is a body of work that keeps you guessing
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today