'Office Romance' showcases the Renzo Piano-designed New York Times building

 A New York Times magazine photo director chronicles her workday inside a landmark skyscraper.

Office Romance: Photographs by Kathy Ryan Aperture Foundation 160 pp.

Kathy Ryan’s Office Romance is a love affair with light and shape. It takes photography to its most basic form to create a beautiful experience.
Ryan is director of photography for The New York Times Magazine and has her office in the Renzo Piano-designed New York Times building erected in 2007.

Armed with an iPhone and confined to a great space, it seems almost as if Ryan conspires with Piano to explore how the 52-story landmark tower filters the “outside” into her “inside” world. As Piano himself notes in the book’s introduction, “From the beginning, the New York Times building was all about the light, and the vibration of light and shadow. In Kathy Ryan’s pictures, I’m happy to find somebody who has captured it!”

Ryan’s photos are not about the building’s architecture, but how it affects her workday. Images of her colleagues, the office computers, her workday rhythm and challenges, and even her sticky notes combine to immerse us in Ryan’s work experience.

This book has the qualities of meditation. The images seem to be the result of long and repeated observation that reveals and rewards those who slow down and take the time to pay attention. The photography in the book has modernist overtones since its primary focus is formal; moreover, the way it is printed, one same-size image per page, also points in that direction.

However, the images in this book do not feel like a throwback to the formal analysis of Edward Weston. Ryan does not take herself too seriously as a photographer. Her images were originally produced in and shared on Instagram, titled by time and date. She confesses that the power of the social media “like” fueled her drive to continue creating and sharing images.

What’s more “today” than that? Not much. Maybe the only thing missing is an author “selfie” on the book jacket.
Alfredo Sosa is the Monitor’s director of photography.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.