'How We Got to Now' credits six technologies with helping to invent modern life

Science writer Steven Johnson takes readers on a rapid but interesting tour of world history as he traces the development of technologies from glass-making to radio broadcasting.

How We Got to Now: Six Innovations That Made the Modern World, by Steven Johnson, Penguin Press, 304 pp.

Steven Johnson’s How We Got to Now: Six Innovations That Made the Modern World opens with an intriguing thought experiment: imagine some form of artificial intelligence analyzing the data of human history. What sort of story would it tell?

If we could avoid programming certain human fixations into the computer, an unusual perspective might emerge. The familiar dynastic sagas of succession, betrayal, and conquest; the waxing and waning of empires; and the intellectual feats of geniuses would appear as unremarkable statistics in larger data sets. With all their engrossing particularities and eccentric personalities stripped away, many episodes from history would just be additional instances of an expected pattern.

But facts and developments that traditional histories tend to marginalize might suddenly seem momentous. The chemical properties of superheated silicon dioxide are not typically given a central role in the human story. And yet without glass, a substance which forms as silicon dioxide cools, the modern profusion of lenses and screens – from smart phones to microscopes to spectacles – would not exist.

Johnson tries to approximate the vantage of a non-human historian in his new book. Adopting what he calls a “long-zoom” approach to history, he traces the development of six influential but often overlooked technologies that have shaped the textures and conditions of contemporary life.

He begins 26 million years ago, with an atmospheric event in the Libyan desert that created glass, then leaps ahead to the glass ornaments that decorated the tomb of an Egyptian pharaoh. Another leap takes us to Venice in the 13th century, where a community of Turkish glassmakers settled after the sack of Constantinople in 1204. Because glass production requires furnaces operating at above 500 degrees, the glassmakers had the unfortunate habit of frequently burning down the wooden neighborhoods where they worked. Hoping to protect the city, the Venetian doges exiled the glassmakers to the island of Murano, a mile across the lagoon.

The dense concentration of so many experts increased competition and collaboration in the trade, and the innovative atmosphere of experimentation soon enabled the production of an incredibly clear type of glass similar to what we use today. The story of glass in human culture was just beginning. Monks poring over manuscripts for long hours often damaged their eyes, but tinkerers discovered that the use of glass in corrective lenses could alleviate the strain.

After Gutenberg’s invention of the printing press in the mid-15th century, the activity of reading began to spread more widely through Europe. Many people suddenly realized that they couldn’t read without the assistance of glasses, and demand for spectacles surged. This new demand prompted hundreds of Europeans to experiment with using convex lenses to manipulate light, and these pioneers in optics invented the microscope and the telescope by the early 17th century.

Johnson is fascinated by the unforeseeable consequences of new technologies. The connection between Gutenberg’s printing press and Galileo’s telescope is hardly obvious, but he draws a compelling line from the birth of print culture to a general interest in lenses that eventually helped Galileo develop a tool that toppled the heliocentric model of the universe.

Of course there were many other preconditions for Galileo’s discovery, so it’s simplistic to say that Gutenberg caused the invention of the telescope. And as with any counterfactual hypothesis, it’s impossible to test whether the telescope or the microscope would have developed without an abundance of printed material acting as an indirect catalyst. These constraints limit the power of his analysis, but Johnson often makes intriguing and plausible connections between seemingly disparate events in the history of science and technology.

The story of glass winds through many other cultural developments, from the rise of mirrors in the Renaissance to the development of fiber optics and computer screens in the 20th century. And glass is only one of six innovations Johnson covers. He also explores our species’ attempts to manipulate and measure sound, light, temperature, sanitation levels, and time.

The material is often intriguing, but Johnson covers such massive spans of time and long sequences of discovery that not every topic is treated with quite the depth it merits. Still, the book is a rapid but interesting tour of the history behind many of the comforts and technologies that comprise our world.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'How We Got to Now' credits six technologies with helping to invent modern life
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today