My Lunches with Orson

Orson Welles revealed much about himself and his career in these conversations with his close friend, fellow director Henry Jaglom, recorded over lunches together between 1983 and 1985.

My Lunches with Orson: Conversations between Henry Jaglom and Orson Welles, by Peter Biskind, Holt, Henry & Company, Inc. 320 pages

Orson Welles is a larger-than-life figure, revered by film aficionados and known to a wider audience for his masterpiece, "Citizen Kane." 

Less familiar is his descent over the last three decades of his life from the fame and fortune he skyrocketed to as a young man in the 1930s theater world. Even "Citizen Kane," despite its critical acclaim, was a financial flop, and his subsequent film "The Magnificent Ambersons" became both a commercial and critical failure after the studio sliced 45 minutes off Welles’s original cut and tacked on a schlocky happy ending while he was abroad. 

Despite memorable performances in "The Third Man" and "A Touch of Evil," his career plummeted, culminating in minor roles in forgettable films and a stint as a spokesperson for Paul Masson wine. Sadly, you can find Welles’s drunken outtakes on YouTube. 

My Lunches with Orson goes some way toward explaining this downward spiral by shedding light on the personal foibles that hindered Welles’s mammoth creativity and the ways that Hollywood’s studio machine blocked him at every turn.  Edited by film historian Peter Biskind, the book consists of conversations with Welles’s close friend, fellow director Henry Jaglom, recorded over lunch between 1983 and 1985, the final years of Welles's life.

That Jaglom became Welles’ de facto agent, angling for support for Welles’s projects and soliciting stars to perform in them, speaks to his desire to rescue him from the weird ignominy of his post-"Kane" career – and that Welles's final role was that of the “friend” in one of Jaglom’s films is fitting.

Ironically, the last film Welles tried – and failed – to make was "King Lear."  Here, in "My Lunches with Orson," Jaglom plays the Fool to Welles’s fallen king. (Although Jaglom is accomplished in his own right, having edited "Easy Rider," which launched the careers of Jack Nicolson, Peter Fonda, and Dennis Hopper).

Instead of the moors, the tragedy takes place in the Hollywood-chic restaurant Ma Maison, where Jaglom listens as Welles relives his golden days, bemoans his fate, and grasps at some illusory possibility of a comeback, which we know will ultimately elude him.   

The pairing of an iconic mentor with a receptive listener echoes "My Dinner with Andre," the film that Biskind’s title alludes to, but whereas director André Gregory’s reflections tend toward the boyishly optimistic, delivered by a man in love with life and the theater, Welles emerges as a tragicomic figure, presiding over his favorite corner table with his poodle Kiki, dismissing overtures from stars as varied as Elizabeth Taylor and Zsa Gabor, alternating between pathos, gossip, deliberate provocation (“I’m a racist, you know”) and insights on politics and culture.

In a moment of striking prescience, he observes, “America has missed absolutely no opportunity, not only during the Reagan administration, but in my lifetime, to render it impossible for us to be anything but the deathly enemy of all Arabs....  We can never polish that image. I don't care how much money we pour into it.”  Touché.

Yet somehow Welles and Jaglom arrived at this subject via an exchange about "The Love Boat." The book is full of such odd juxtapositions of the profound and insipid. Welcome to Hollywood.

It’s most pleasurable to read Welles’s reflections on "Kane" or projects like "The Cradle Will Rock," "The Third Man," and the idiosyncratic "F is for Fake," and I wished the conversations included more of Welles on his own work.  (Biskind’s introduction does a nice job of narrating the arc of his career, bridging some gaps.)  

Welles’s commentary on other celebrities can be witty, but speaks mainly to his aggrievements.  Admirers may enjoy his anecdotes and barbs, but will likely echo Jaglom’s frustration at the projects he conceived and never realized, or the parts he turned down, such as the husband in George Cukor’s "Gaslight."

"My Lunches with Orson" also offers the experience of sitting in on a particular historical-cultural moment – a time when the biggest stars were Nicholson, Beatty, and Reynolds, and the latest technology was “these laser discs and video things.”  Read with your Netflix on hand, as Welles’s wealth of knowledge inspires re-viewings of both his own films and those of his favorite actors like Buster Keaton and Carol Lombard.

Learning about the obstacles Welles faced in Hollywood also inspires an appreciation for the venues for independent film that exist today.  Had he been around for the explosion of indies and the creation of IFC and the like, Welles would have undoubtedly had a more satisfying career, while still maintaining the integrity of his unique vision.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to My Lunches with Orson
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/Book-Reviews/2013/0715/My-Lunches-with-Orson
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe