Fifty Sides of the Beach Boys

A closer, deeper look at one of America's greatest pop bands of all time.

Fifty Sides of the Beach Boys: The Songs That Tell Their Story By Mark Dillon ECW Press 289 pp.

Canadian journalist Mark Dillon’s book about one of the most important American pop groups is fan-based journalism at its best – and much more. It’s an entertaining, even-handed examination of the great southern California band through commentary on 50 of its tunes by members, collaborators, and musicians the Boys influenced. Timed to coincide with the reconciled group’s 50th-anniversary tour and a new album, Fifty Sides of the Beach Boys is far more keeper than souvenir.

Over their often-conflicted career, the Beach Boys have been inspiring, experimental, courageous, innocent, wounded – and creative. Brian Wilson, their troubled yet persistent leader, is a musical genius. The other Boys were lesser lights, but Brian couldn’t have wrought what he did without them.

Journalism about Brian, his entrepreneurial and aggressive cousin Mike Love, and Brian’s brothers Carl and Dennis – the first dead of cancer, the second drowned – is usually framed as a story of heroes and villains, and the Beach Boys were indeed dysfunctional. Wilson père Murry, a failed musician, was a tyrant, which Dillon doesn’t soft pedal. At the same time, Dillon gives Murry his due as a goad to the group’s creativity. He even tempers a commonly held negative view of Eugene Landy, the discredited Hollywood psychoanalyst Brian’s wife, Marilyn, hired in 1975, suggesting in an interview with “15 Big Ones” engineer Earle Mankey that though Landy was a control freak who charged outrageous prices for his counsel, he did help the errant and troubled Brian return to the studio.

In 1967, when the Beach Boys foundered over “Smile” (original title: “Dumb Angel”), a storied album that went officially unreleased until last year, I bought Van Dyke Parks’ brilliantly opaque “Song Cycle,” one of the earliest free-form rock recordings. In Dillon’s interview with “Smile”-obsessed Apples in Stereo leader Robert Schneider, Dillon says Parks abandoned his collaboration with Brian Wilson on “Smile” because of resistance from other group members, instead settling into work on “Song Cycle.” Such back stories give “50 Sides” factual muscle. (Too bad Parks wouldn’t make himself available for an interview.) 

When I interviewed Mike Love in 1970 in Burlington, Vt., during Love’s visit to a Transcendental Meditation center to push Maharishi Mahesh Yogi’s methodology, I found him smug and guarded. The headline on my  Burlington Free Press story: “Lie Around Your Lear Jet and Be a Star.”

In 1982, as a reporter for the Schenectady, N.Y. Gazette, I reviewed the Beach Boys at the Saratoga Performing Arts Center and found myself backstage standing next to Brian Wilson. He was bearded and heavy and seemed in a kind of trance. At the end of 1986, after I moved to Cleveland, my first freelance article for the Cleveland Plain Dealer packaged an interview with Stephen Gaines, a Beach Boys biographer, with commentary on “Smile,” the aborted and at that time heavily bootlegged album many consider the group’s crowning achievement.

The Beach Boys matter to me.

After reading this book, which features interviews with everyone from group stalwart David Marks (on this summer’s reunion tour) to Dennis’ good friend and touring band associate Billy Hintsche to “Sail on Sailor” lead vocalist Blondie Chaplin, they might well matter to you, too. In effect, Dillon joins the reader to the Beach Boys’ family, extended over 50 years and as many tunes, many of them unexpected choices that will send you back to your iDevice. They might even persuade you to fire up your turntable.

Turns out, despite Brian’s assertion that he wasn’t made for these times, the Beach Boys were made for all times.

The author of “Cleveland Rock & Roll Memories,” Carlo Wolff is developing “Invisible Soul,” a book about underground Cleveland soul music from doo-wop to disco.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.