A Q&A with Megan Phelps-Roper, author of ‘Unfollow’

Former Westboro Baptist Church member Megan Phelps-Roper discusses her break with the organization, Twitter, and her new book, “Unfollow.”

Courtesy of Michelle Wray
Megan Phelps-Roper is the author of “Unfollow: A Memoir of Loving and Leaving the Westboro Baptist Church.”

Megan Phelps-Roper grew up in the Westboro Baptist Church, which has been designated a hate group by civil rights organizations. She ran Westboro’s Twitter account until she broke with the church in 2012. Most of her family remains in the church and hasn’t spoken to her since. She credits conversations on Twitter for shifting her beliefs, and she later married a lawyer with whom she had sparred online. She now works to combat extremism. She spoke with the Monitor’s Riley Robinson. 

Q: How did you find common ground with your opponents on Twitter? 

Functionally 100% of people who came to my page were angry and hostile. But people could tell I was sincere about what I believed [then]. They started asking questions, and that changed the dynamics. Then I started asking them questions and they’d say something about their day or their pets or their children.

On Twitter there was time and space to develop that rapport. It enabled me to empathize with the perspectives of other people. That was a huge part of my ability to challenge what I had been taught and then eventually walk away from it.

Q: How do you reconcile your love for family members still in the church while you no longer accept their beliefs?

I believe that they are good people who have been trapped by bad ideas.

The vast majority of people in the church are people who grew up in it, who had it spoon-fed to them the same way that I did. And I know that it was not isolation or hatred or cruelty that made me change. It was continued engagement – persistent, gentle, kind, compassionate engagement from people who believed differently.

I’m not necessarily hoping that now they’ll read the book and completely change. I know that that’s not how it works. But I do hope that it will cause them to at least think about things even slightly differently.

Q: This book began as an essay you wrote for your husband. Why did you write that essay and why did you continue it as a book? 

I needed him to understand the puritanical culture I grew up in, so I wrote this essay – it was 14,000 words – as a Christmas gift. Before I gave it to him, I sent it to a friend who is my writing mentor. He [said], “You have to write a book.” When I finished that first draft, all of a sudden it hit me that I had stopped reading Westboro’s tweets every single day. I hadn’t read them for three weeks. 

Q: Some readers might compare “Unfollow” to Tara Westover’s “Educated,” this genre of people leaving the faith they were raised in. 

Reading Tara’s book, especially as she’s describing the physical danger that her father put her family in, where he said, Oh, the angels will take care of us, you’re like, “What are [they] doing?”

I realized people are going to read my book and think the same thing [about Westboro church members]. 

It doesn’t matter how well you explain it. There’s just such a fundamental disconnect between how you see something and how this other person doing these extreme things sees that thing.

Q: What makes understanding Westboro salient at this particular moment?

It’s important to see people as being on a journey. If you look at who you were a year ago and aren’t somewhat embarrassed, you’re not growing as a person.

If you can see these people ... as human beings and capable of change, there is hope. We should be willing to reach out. Imagine what could happen if we kept reaching out to people like Westboro members? There’s so much power in seeing the possibility of change.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.