6 baseball books for mid-season reading

These new releases should provide a good selection for summer reading.

6. ‘The Integration of the Pacific Coast League: Race and Baseball on the West Coast’ by Amy Essington

The West Coast’s reputation as socially progressive was a factor even in sports. Amy Essington, a history instructor at Cal State, Fullerton, tells the story of how the Pacific Coast League, a popular minor league before the majors’ westward expansion, became one of the first leagues in any sport to integrate throughout. If it appeared ahead of the times, the PCL was not necessarily a model of open hiring, signing African Americans who team owners claimed were native Americans between 1900 and 1930, along with Hawaiians and Asians. However achieved, the Pacific Coast League was a diversity leader. 

Here’s an excerpt from The Integration of the Pacific Coast League:

“After the first team of the Pacific Coast League integrated, it took only five seasons for the remaining seven teams to add players of color to their rosters. The PCL integrated at a faster pace than the Major Leagues, which did not integrate all sixteen of its teams until 1959. By August 1950, in their third season of integration, 60 percent of the PCL teams had signed at least one player of color, whereas the Major League, in its fourth year of integration, had players of color on 25 percent of their 16 teams. In 1951 the PCL teams fielded more black players than any other Minor League. The Pacific Coast League was the first to integrate all its teams. During the 1950, 1951, and 1952 seasons the Sacramento Solons, the San Francisco Seals, the Hollywood Stars, and the Seattle Raniers each added players of color to their rosters. The integration of all eight PCL teams in just five years shows that the process had not only gained momentum but, by reaching all of the teams, become part of a social movement for change in the West.”

6 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.