9 sports books for spring

Here are excerpts from seven new books about sports.

8. ‘The United States Tennis Association: Raising the Game’ by Warren F. Kimball

When a book comes with a 21-page index, you can be sure it’s no ordinary sports book. In this case, the extensive index is a tipoff to the depth of research and facts that have gone into chronicling the history of the largely volunteer governing body of tennis in the United States. The author, Warren F. Kimball, is professor emeritus of history at Rutgers University and a former board member of the United States Tennis Association, which manages and governs the sport from the local level to the US Open tournament in New York. During the late 1960s, the Open pioneered in inviting professionals to play in previously amateur Grand Slam tournaments. 

Here’s an excerpt from The United States Tennis Association:

“The ‘lawn’ in ‘lawn tennis,’ with its elitist connection to private clubs, particularly in the Northeast, needed to go. Unlike the discussion in 1920 about dropping ‘National’ from the Association’s name, ‘mowing the lawn’ came without serious argument or objection – though it had been suggested a number of times in the past. The Middle States delegate, Dick Botsch, pointed out at the 1975 annual meeting that half of the sections did not have a ‘lawn’ in their name. More important, the Association represented only an ‘embarrassing one quarter of one percent of all tennis players in this country,’ a reference to the dramatic growth of the game was experiencing in the 1970s. Botsch reminded the delegates that, oddly the word ‘lawn’ defined the specifics of the rules, not the surface, then argued that the name change would improve the Association’s image, which had inherited from its origins at ‘exclusive eastern country clubs.’ That would make membership more attractive to new players. On March 28, 1975, the official name of the Association changed to the United States Tennis Association – the USTA.”

8 of 9

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.