6 baseball books for midseason reading

Dig into a great read about baseball this summer! Here are some choices.

6. 'The Cooperstown Casebook: Who’s in the Baseball Hall of Fame, Who Should Be In, and Who Should Pack Their Plaques,’ by Jay Jaffe

For those who like to wade into the statistical weeds of baseball – to analyze player performance using today’s advanced metrics – “The Cooperstown Casebook” delivers. Author Jay Jaffe, who once introduced a Hall of Fame candidate evaluation system known by its acronym of JAWS, fills 400 pages with analyses meant to objectively measure the worthiness of both Hall of Famers and wannabe candidates to the upstate New York baseball shrine. 

Here’s an excerpt from The Cooperstown Casebook:

“You can’t discuss the Baseball Hall of Fame in the twenty-first century – let alone write a book about it – without addressing the topic of performance-enhancing drugs, even if doing so presents a prospect only slightly more fun than being spiked by Ty Cobb.

“The full extent to which anabolic steroids, human growth hormone, and stimulants altered the on-field performances not only of hitters but of pitchers will never be known, as it’s impossible to create a definitive list of who used what and for how long, and no direct studies were ever designed to determine the ways the such drugs could alter baseball-specific actions. What is inarguable is the PEDs altered perceptions of the game among both fans and media, introducing levels of anger and cynicism that inevitably spilled over into Hall of Fame debates. Voters introduced previously unseen levels of moral judgment into the process, as candidates were evaluated not only on the strength of their accomplishments” but their authenticity – whether they did it ‘the right way.’ ”

6 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.